I'm debating this with my friend. I think Reggie Bush will be better than LT later on in his career. What are some stats or other things I can use to support this.
2007-01-21 08:22:13 · 5 answers · asked by kknights81 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Well here's some stats for you.
Rookie Seasons:
Yards per carry - Bush: 3.6, LT: 3.6
Fumbles - Bush: 2, LT: 5
Receiving yards - Bush: 742, LT: 367
And Bush has a very good chance to win a Super Bowl his rookie season.
2007-01-21 09:06:12 · update #1
I got nothing here to support you....
Reggie Bush is an outstanding player, but he won't be better then LT. LT is the next big thing for running backs.
2007-01-21 08:27:09 · answer #1 · answered by poeticpyr07 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You spelled Laidanian wrong... Aight let me make this clear no one in this fucki.n league is better then LT Reggie just has speed and agility no power no strategy. LT can thrown and is the best leader in the league.
2007-01-21 08:28:14 · answer #2 · answered by Lights Out #3 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe when L.T. is really old Reggie will be better. Reggie is a good rb but L.T. is better. I mean, Reggie doesn't even have a nickname yet.
2007-01-21 09:16:25 · answer #3 · answered by Kasey B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He might be faster. Other than that, you're on the losing side of an argument you should've never gotten involved in.
2007-01-21 08:35:11 · answer #4 · answered by BRAINS! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no known arguments or stats to support this. Sorry.
2007-01-21 08:27:19 · answer #5 · answered by aggiecoolness_28 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋