Liberals support terrorism??? And how, pray tell, do we do that?

Question

That's one of the many ridiculous things I read in answer to my question about what the right wing is so afraid of from liberal thinkers. I DO NOT support terrorists. I do NOT want to tear down the US. And I DON'T think that anyone from Washington D.C. should be spending my tax dollars in ways that I see as unfit. (Like war OR handouts!!!) Neither do I feel that anyone should be getting richer from a war that is killing "collateral", both ours and theirs.

Well, I "sorry 'bout that", too-----sorry you feel that if I don't support YOUR idea of a solution that I am part of the problem. I have yet to see the US go after the terrorists!! If the Bush family wasn't so close to the bin Laden family we might have cornered the actual terrorist "mastermind", but, no-oooo, we fight terrorists in a country where there weren't any--but there are now BECAUSE of our involvment???? Now, that's really PhD-style brilliance--------------------not!!!

Answer 1

We don't. Of course we don't. We hate terrorists and we do not want them to attack us! We just think that the war in Iraq is helping, if anything we think it made things worse. And FYI, we don't hate the troops or america. People disagree on things. It doens't make them traitors. (treason is a capitol crime, are your prepared to start executing people in this country for their beliefs?)

Answer 2

Like this:
Al Qaeda Sends a Message to Democrats
December 22, 2006 2:28 PM
Brian Ross and Hoda Osman Report:
Al Qaeda has sent a message to leaders of the Democratic party that credit for the defeat of congressional Republicans belongs to the terrorists.
December 22, 2006 2:28 PM
In a portion of the tape from al Qaeda No. 2 man, Ayman al Zawahri, made available only today, Zawahri says he has two messages for American Democrats.
"The first is that you aren't the ones who won the midterm elections, nor are the Republicans the ones who lost. Rather, the Mujahideen -- the Muslim Ummah's vanguard in Afghanistan and Iraq -- are the ones who won, and the American forces and their Crusader allies are the ones
Zawahri calls on the Democrats to negotiate with him and Osama bin Laden, not others in the Islamic world who Zawahri says cannot help.
"And if you don't refrain from the foolish American policy of backing Israel, occupying the lands of Islam and stealing the treasures of the Muslims, then await the same fate," he said.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/12/al_qaeda_sends_.html

Answer 3

Here is how Cindy Sheehan goes global trotting pushing her anti-war rants.
Liberals calling our troops terrorist, cold blooded murders, nazis, stupid. That is from the ones who are elected.

The protests never ending about Gitmo yet when our guys get beheaded no a whisper.

NY Times can publish national secrets no a word is spoke but a desk jockey who gets "outed" is a never ending story.

Abu Grabi gets hours and hours of press yet dragging the dead around nothing from the liberals.

All the cry is bash Bush no matter what. Liberals have forgotten this is a war. 9/11 was not a one act wonder that was suppose to be our wake up call. bin laden is not the only terrorist or terrorist organization in town.

When Israel had enough of rockets coming from Hezbollah and went after them. Who cry Israel was out of control the liberals.

When Liberman supported the war on terror what did the liberals do put a full courts press on him to the point is no longer a democrate.

Comparing Bush to Hilter and calling that debate.

9/11 consparcy theroies getting hearing in Congress.

9th Ciruit Court kicking back sentencing hearing a bomber.

Let us not forget when monitoring internation phone conversations to known terrorist is call spying on Americans.

Demonizng the any law that is going after terrorist saying this in of all our freedoms. The same laws use to stop orgainize crime use against terrorist.

Clinton establishing the wall where intel couldn't talk to other groups. The author of it was on the 9/11 commision hearings.
Thus she couldn't be question about her role in 9/11.

First time in history we have hearings in the middle of the war.
After Pearl Harbor we didn't have hearings until after the war was over.

Our troops come back from Iraq saying we are getting the story wrong. Does that the press no.

The Imams who pulled a stunt on the US Airways and sympathy for them over "flying while Muslim" yet after 3 independent investigation they clear US Airways because they acted properly.

I can go on but I do hope you see how the liberals don't care about who is out to kill us just to bash Bush is all you guys care about.


So what is more important to stop those who are out to kill us or bash Bush.

Answer 4

then you dont understand why I vote conservative,I do this because,I follow my gut morals on issues,and think about what consequenses come from my vote,yes I'm sure you have much to say for Bush.but I cant support the liberal left whom supports killing in the womb(abortion or EMBRYO stem cell research)there are other ways of getting stem cells without killing a child,or a party that doesnt consider anything but power.If you consider the brave people whom have fallen as collateral,then you dont understand the basic functions of living and dying for what you believe in or the way of the right to live,at least as I seem to see it.As far as using your tax dollars,well you'll never get exactly what you want,especially from the left,the right too,but the left lives to raise taxes

Answer 5

Liberals never said they weren't interested in fighting terrorism. I'm always amazed how much people don't listen. All liberals don't support terrorism and the GOP does not have the monopoly on fighting terrorism or patriotism. Anyone who believes they do are morons and haven't been paying attention for the last 12 years. My god, just because you are against war in Iraq, doesn't mean you are against fighting terrorism. Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism or 9/11, I wish people would wise up and come to their senses on this.
BUSH LIED ABOUT THE REASONS FOR GOING TO WAR IN IRAQ, HE AND CHENEY COOKED THE BOOKS AND LIED TO CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. BY DEFINITION IN THE CONSTITUTION, THIS IS IN FACT, TREASON.
If Bush was serious about going after terrorists, where is Osama Bin Laden and Al Zarwiri the masterminds? Comeon people, wake up, you are sleep walking if you still believe Bush and his cronies. This isn't about negotiating with terrorists like some cons have you believing about liberals, this is about real action in protecting American people. Waging a war on a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 isn't going to stop terrorism, it is going to create more terrorists, even the CIA and Pentagon knows this and has said it.

Answer 6

Would you rather have to fight the terrorists here or there? Libs that hate war are basically saying let it rest and we'll deal with it when it gets here. News Flash, IT ALREADY GOT HERE!! It's either/or there is no middle ground when dealing with terrorists. Conservatives firmly believe that no one can negotiate with a terrorist and it's true. Why can't the liberals see that the terrorists what their religion to be the religion? They will try to convert us to ilsam and if we don't they will "try" to kill us. What part of that do some of you not understand?

Sheesh, give me any conservative to fight with me side by side. I know I can watch his/her back and vise versa. I'm afraid if I have a demcrat by my side in a fight we'd both end up dead. Not something I'm willing to negotiate dear.

Answer 7

Actually, I think what people mean is the attempts to "protect peoples rights" VS the safety of the country. Its a left wing view point that opposes the Patriot Act and its attempts to monitor terrorist and protect this country.

So, that's why many feel that "liberals" support terrorist.

Answer 8

Terrorism contained in the type depicted on television does no longer exist. those with intelligence ought to think of of television as the two a occasion political software or an commercial. Taking television first, then all of us comprehend that it is carefully controlled by way of some Zionist families, who're consistently forwarding their schedule for international take over. shop ing human beings terrified potential they stay subdued, and extremely hassle-free to administration and manage. previous answerers have pronounced the hijackings of 9/11, tand he London tube bombings. there is quite sturdy data to coach that 9/11 grow to be an interior interest, and that there have been in actuality no hijackings. The London tube bombings have precisely the comparable hallmark, with the fingerprints of MI5 and MI6 throughout it. we've these days chanced on that the IRA grow to be funded by way of the secret centers, and can desire to subsequently be seen to be an extension of them. If we discounted all so-called terrorism which has been organised and/or carried out by way of the secret centers of CIA/FBI/MI5/MI6/Mossad (Israel) and ISI (Pakistan), then there may be little or no, if any, terrorism to account for. the present improve in suicide bombings in Iraq is rather defined by way of an comprehend-how of depleted uranium. The shells used contained in the Iraq conflict (and desert typhoon and Kosovo until eventually now it) are a clean form of shell incorporating depleted uranium. while exploded they launch an excellent mist of radio-lively uranium. This radiation contacts the lungs and organs of everybody contained in the region, and that they promptly start to be afflicted by maximum cancers, and comprehend that they are quickly to die, in large soreness. below those circumstances, they are purely too prepared to die, and to have the skill to take a number of their tormentors with them. contained in the comparable circumstances, lots of the readers right here might prefer to dedicate suicide. So, to reply to the question in basic terms, terrorism does exist, and, like the conflict on drugs etc, is carefully organised and controlled by way of the secret centers. and - no-one ought to base their ideals on what they see on television, or study contained in the newspapers, yet on their own genuine journey. For those in touch as a survivor in a so-called terrorist attack, do they actually comprehend for particular who created the attack, or are they basing their thinking on propaganda?

Answer 9

If one is not part of the solution, they are part of the problem. If the liberals think we shouldn't fight terrorism, they are part of the problem. Complacency got us 9/11, the conservatives want to prevent another by fighting the terrorists, not striving to appease the terrorists

Answer 10

Liberal thinker? Now there's an oxymoron.

If you actually were a thinker you'd be able to understand how trying validate or make excuses for terrorists is supporting them.

How opposing every attempt to deal with them.. is in fact giving them support.

You may not believe in their ideology.. but everything liberals seem to want benefits terrorists.