English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

That sounds good to me and maybe even have "child molester" tattooed on their forehead.

2007-01-21 07:37:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

i in my opinion agree yet yet dissagree on the sametime. I HATE baby molesters they're ill mentally I dont care what a pschologist says. I do think of that they could desire to be positioned someplace they cant ever do it returned yet castrating them could advance those that have self assurance interior the demanding and extraordinary punishment deal. I mean come on they visit reformatory for purely 2-4 years and then they're released and archives instruct that they finally end up doing it returned I mean helpful they could desire to sign in as a intercourse criminal everywhere they go yet that doesnt even end them because of the fact some ppl dont ever look to work out if the guy around the corner is a registered intercourse criminal. Imprisoned for something of their existence particular castrated particular and no. greater measures could desire to be taken to tell the community that the intercourse criminal is going to stay in.

2016-11-26 00:27:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I like the 'child molester' tattoo on the forehead idea. They dont need to be punished for anything else, that alone should be enough for them.

There are far worse things then death and libido removal.

They shouldnt be allowed to remove it too.

2007-01-21 07:43:34 · answer #3 · answered by Antares 6 · 0 0

No, that would cost too much, and I'll be damned to pay more out of my taxes to handle situations like this. I think hanging would be the best option, and if I was a judge in Utah, that's just what they'd get

2007-01-21 07:44:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

castraction: chemical or physical? decisions decisons...

well most 'changed' molesters, the ones who are 'sorry' say castratation doesnt remove the 'urge'.

so i say both.

but what if they were innocent? that brings up a whole notha' issure.

but the guilty ones, as in, caught on dateline guilty. hell yeah.

2007-01-21 07:37:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

life in a 2x2 cell would be to good for them.or hand them over to me.I'll take good care of the low life bastards. castrat then with a rusty pin knife or rusty hacksaw blade.

2007-01-21 07:43:33 · answer #6 · answered by I'm Jerry 4 · 1 0

Actually, they should pay for their crimes like everyone else does, by fulfilling what the judges we elect order them to do. Or, we can start cutting the hands off thieves. What a wonderful world.

2007-01-21 07:39:41 · answer #7 · answered by J 4 · 0 1

Get them off the street permanently! Life no chance of parole. Or execute them

2007-01-21 07:43:28 · answer #8 · answered by DylisTN 3 · 2 0

Both sound good to me.

2007-01-21 07:42:46 · answer #9 · answered by FireBug 5 · 0 0

yep

2007-01-21 07:36:19 · answer #10 · answered by Just me 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers