I think it will be worse than it is.
2007-01-21 06:30:48 · 19 answers · asked by Big Ben 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Plan on it being worse.
First of all, the frontrunner, Clinton, is promising to roll back all of Bush's actions. So count on a lot of chaos.
Also, since the democrats don't want security, count on us letting a bomber or two in from Iran or the Taliban, to set off a few more disasters. It's a charming thought, but if the action states the fact, I'd buy a gas mask.
Secondly, they like to critisize bush for his actions, but fail to see what else has has done. Has he overtaxed us? No. Raise Taxes? No. Democrats like to harp on the war, and the death toll, but if we bailed out in World War 2 after 3000 died...we would have left after pearl harbor, and wake Island...not to mention Bataan.
No, I'd say once Bush is out, our ethics and values will sink...and it'll go to hell in a handbasket.
2007-01-21 06:36:52 · answer #1 · answered by steveraven 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it will take years at least 10 or more to undo what king George done the only way it could get worse if we get another republican in there or worse yet another bush i heard that his brother might run that should keep the war going if he gets in there
2007-01-21 06:40:23 · answer #2 · answered by MARY ann 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we've had some enormously awful president....Hardy, Andrew Johnson, Hoover, Nixon to call some.... With that suggested i think of his best mistake replaced into getting us into Iraq. The WMD replaced into uncertain and the tale of them hiding terrorist replaced right into a narrative to feed into our fears on the time. those that understand something approximately center East historic previous understand that Saddam replaced into with the bathe social gathering and he replaced into centred by using those terrorist. Osama bin encumbered might have in no way gotten asylum in his us of a, it would have and nevertheless is Pakistan. As for claiming the economy went up directly, we went to conflict and the economy will spike for the period of that factor yet will finally pass down using value of the conflict.
2016-10-31 22:22:21 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi Big Ben, Your right it will be a lot worse.President Bush is doing the best he can.I would like to see just one of us sit in his chair for just one week. That way we can see,and feel what's going on in this nation. We wouldn't last the whole week out.
Clowmy
2007-01-21 06:37:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It depends who the next president will be. But i don't think there can be anyone worse the George W.
2007-01-21 06:33:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why don't we let the American public vote and see the outcome of the elections. With me being British, I'd say you're going to be better off without Bush, just like Britain will be better off without Blair!
2007-01-21 06:35:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Since a Democrat will probably win, and these neoDems are so much more socialist than before, we will most likely be worse off than before
2007-01-21 06:32:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I couldn't honestly say because hopefully we get someone new that has a new idea and strategy. Were already deep in the hole lets just hope they don't dig us deeper. I hope (trying to be optimistic) that things will get better with time if we do what's necessary. We can only hope....
2007-01-21 06:36:12 · answer #8 · answered by Matrixgyal 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on who's going in when he goes out.
2007-01-21 06:33:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WORSE OFF IF A DEMOCRAT TAKES OFFICE VOTE FOR RUDY
2007-01-21 06:34:02 · answer #10 · answered by burnem1991 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋