In USA history there has been no female president, and to my knowledge (and I dont have much because i'm English) their has been no female to actually run... So would America like to have a Female president? Who thinks it would be a bad thing? Who wants a female to at least run....?
2007-01-21 05:58:29 · 12 answers · asked by st_jimmy1984 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would love to have a female president, but the politics of it all are what have kept women from making it far enough to run. Because u cant appear to be too independent, smart, determined or the right will label them as subversive or better yet a lesbian. And you cannot appear to be too nuturing, motherly, loving, and dutiful or the left will label them as a candidate who is more loyal to her husband than the country. Its a tricky situation and it takes a special person to break that mold and those barriers. Im not quite sure we've found the right woman yet though.
Hillary Clinton is political competent because of her experience and her connections, but she has serious baggage and she is very independent of her husband and doesn't mind being seen as a career woman.
2007-01-21 06:28:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've been waiting for years for a female to run that is both qualified and has a good chance of winning. We have that in Hillary Clinton. I couldn't support a woman candidate simply because of her gender, but I support Hillary. She is not the best woman for the job, she is the best candidate for the job. Brilliant, formidable, and perfectly suited for the White House. I appreciate her knowledge gained from being an insider in the White House for 8 years, her six years as Senator, and her deep involvement on the Armed Services Committee. I don't think she is cold, but I do think she is calculating - and that I can also appreciate. I have no problem imagining her steely gaze while staring down a dangerous head of state while her mind quickly calculates her country's best response, no problem at all.
2007-01-21 06:12:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The nineteenth modification, which offered women human beings the right to vote, is in user-friendly words 88 years previous. i recognize that a lady ought to and does have each and every correct to carry such an workplace as a guy, yet change is equipped in inches and not in any respect miles. We nonetheless have a discrepancy in pay between the sexes, so chauvinism does exist, will it exist contained in the election procedure, perchance. In different countries, women human beings have served properly, yet had to conquer a great deal to attain this variety of position. i trust that for some, the country is waiting for a lady to steer, yet she should be a trailblazer with an truly thick pores and skin. I actually have enclosed a link to three different widespread woman leaders, perchance this can coach you that success has been had by technique of persons of the option sex, and perchance right here contained in the USA.
2016-12-02 20:35:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Who thinks it would be a bad thing?"
It can't possibly be any worse than having a testosterone-driven male who's blood thirsty for war ... Don't you agree?
Honestly, I think it's about time a woman runs the country. After all, we far outnumber the males on the planet and yet, somehow, they've seemed to gain control and tell us what we can and can't do in this world.
2007-01-21 07:01:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Though there is no longer a solid rule "a" before a consonant "an" before a vowel, works well. Sometimes the meter works better the other way. Not in this case.
Go big Red Go
2007-01-21 06:07:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Two Presidents for the price of one. Hell yeah!!
2007-01-21 06:04:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Maggie Thatcher turned out to be one hard core lady in the eighties.....maybe even Clinton has a set of nads........Maybe.
2007-01-21 06:03:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
It's a little generic to just want a female president because it depends on who this female is. If it be Hilary Clinton, NO THANKS!
2007-01-21 06:03:48 · answer #8 · answered by 2007 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
not if it was hitlery
"Why not? All that matters is competency. ability, vision, intelligence, etc. Color and gender don't matter. "
if gender doesn't matter than why would we want a female to be president?(if it didn't matter- it wouldn't matter) and why are even discussing this?
2007-01-21 06:04:21 · answer #9 · answered by adam adrenal 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Why not? All that matters is competency. ability, vision, intelligence, etc. Color and gender don't matter.
2007-01-21 06:02:51 · answer #10 · answered by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋