'wiritten' definitely.
You should get full marks for that.
2007-01-21 05:59:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
it depends:
I am sorry that I haven't been able to write to you for a long time, I have been very busy.
I am sorry that I didn't write to you for a long time, I have been very busy.
Had not is just wrong.
2007-01-21 14:00:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Some Wisegal. 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
haven't
had not would also be correct but it sounds better: hadn't is just the words 'had not' merged together for easier pronounciation.
didn't would also be correct but in that context its more likely for someone to use 'haven't'
im not sure i have explained it very well but i hope it is even a little bit easier. if you need any more help just send me an e-mail.
xx
2007-01-21 14:01:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by chatterbox15 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Haven't
2007-01-21 13:58:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't take any notice of Paul T - "had not wrote" is NOT correct English.
The past participle of "to write" is written
You only use "wrote" after a noun or pronoun (I wrote, John wrote etc)
2007-01-21 15:16:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by chip2001 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Answer is i havn't written, you could also have sorry i didnt write to you for a long time!
2007-01-21 14:11:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by diane e 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The word that works best is haven't, but I would go with have not instead.
2007-01-21 13:59:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Haven't or have not.
You will use it for the same reason you used "have been" very busy in the same sentence. :)
2007-01-21 14:03:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Meg M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
haven't or have not or you could type, sorry i haven't contacted you for a long time
2007-01-21 14:04:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by sky 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry I have not written to you as I have been busy.
or
I'm sorry I did not write to you as I promised but I've been busy.
'had not wrote' is wrong as is 'have not wrote.'
2007-01-21 15:47:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋