No, because it's like world peace, it'll never happen.
2007-01-21 05:58:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by sadie sue 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
maximum gender adjustments have been notably studied by skill of psychology, in very strict experimental paradigms to create empirical outcomes (merely pre-guessing your come returned, seeing as you experience the could desire to call technological awareness "demanding technological awareness". those are empirical demanding-technological awareness exams, regardless of you thought of psychology as an entire is). There ARE some adjustments. some. consistent with danger 5 innate psychological adjustments (i.e. maths, linguistic skills, context information and so on) those adjustments are very small (r of around 0.7, while maximum r values are above a million) yet important, although there is likewise a number of version - the two generic distribution curves overlap, so maximum folk from the two genders fall interior the comparable section (think of of a Venn Diagram, and the circles extraordinarily much completely overlap). So that's impossible to prepare those adjustments as a man or woman point. Evolution takes a protracted time, behavoir is complicated and adaptable. maximum of our behavoir comes from social motives, no matter in case you like it or no longer. there's a nature nurture interaction, and there are organic and organic adjustments, yet they even have a number of version consistent with danger feminists sell this idfea because of the fact those adjustments are impossible to work out reliably different than with careful and useful (which skill sturdy at detecting adjustments) exams utilized to a great pattern. Your element approximately "why no longer purely be persons?" truly contadicts gender adjustments. For there to be solid adjustments between to populations, those populations could could desire to have a definite point of inner coherance or loss of individuality.
2016-11-26 00:20:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are really no gender differences between the sexes. It's only seen that men and women are unequal because of the long time put down by the powerful influences of the society as a whole and by ourselves as well. Women are not unequal. We never have been. But instead of listening to our true voices, the ones that are hidden deep within us, we allow ourselves to be subjected to a some-what 'silent prisoners'. But we are not prisoners to the other sex, we are imprisoned within ourselves because of fear. Fear that speaking out and showing our true colors and standing together to change societies definition of 'equality'. We, as women, are equal to men. Together. Expressing our views and never fearing the impossible. But as a single individual, all alone, equality is not as powerful or world changing.
2007-01-21 06:14:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by fluke_o_nature 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't believe equality has to mean sameness. It means equal respect and equal opportunity. If a woman is able to do a traditional "man's job" it should be open to her. However there will always be some areas where the physical differences between men and women really do matter.
2007-01-21 06:06:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by mj_indigo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sure some sort of understanding and tolerance can be reached, but if you're asking if males and females will one day start acting the same the answer is NO!
It is a fact that the female and male brain are wired differently.
2007-01-21 06:05:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Equality (in regard to our make-up) in every sense is a naive goal as women instinctively nature while men protect and enable that process (perhaps in an ideal world). I think we should aim to enable and support each other to exercise our generic abilities and agree to be different but appreciate that difference (one does not outweigh the other, they are equally important and necessary) other than use it to undermine, oppress or otherwise dominate.
2007-01-21 07:02:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by kahahius 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that it would be difficult, but not impossible. The sexes should be equal in rights and responsibilites, but they are never going to be equal in some things. Men are never going to be able to bear children, and very few women will be able to be oil-rig workers or quarterbacks in the NFL. They cannot be expected to be the same, but they should be given equal opportunities.
2007-01-21 08:15:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No because there will always be things that a woman will be able to do over a man and vice versa. I mean how many dad's get off for maternity leave?
2007-01-21 05:58:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jinxy B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a meaningless question. It's a partnership, not some utopian state. Partners share the load, do what they do well and bring what they have into a relationship. They either accept the partnership and the ramifications of it, or they don't.
2007-01-21 07:34:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope
2007-01-21 06:02:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Craig 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, there are to many people who would not want that type of equility so it will never happen.
2007-01-21 06:22:00
·
answer #11
·
answered by Wicked 7
·
0⤊
0⤋