2007-01-21 04:49:01 · 11 answers · asked by bobmoss75 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, having a Female President will cause great harms to the USA
1. All Male US soldiers will no longer want to fight
2. If Iran's President challenge H. Clinton to a fist fight what will we do...
3. H. Clinton might get a back massage from the Chinese like the one Bush gave to the German Chancellor
4. Conservatives don't want the Interns in the White House to be black men if the President is a woman
5. H. Clinton might be saying "I did not had sex with that man...= Fox owner Rupert Murdoch..."
2007-01-21 05:45:33 · answer #1 · answered by mr america 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the experience, in the military or intelligence sectors of our government to be effective in a time when we are fighting a war oversees and conducting a broader “war” on terrorism. Normally, this would not be an impediment, and there have been many good Presidents, with no serious military credentials –– her husband being one of them. However, in order to rectify the quagmire that Bush has got us in, and also to redirect the “War on Terrorism” more effectively, and away from this cowboy/Rambo strategy employed by Bush and his henchmen, requires someone of either military or strategic competence. Hillary might be a stellar policy maker on the domestic front, but right now we need someone who demonstrates mastery of both military tactics and foreign diplomacy.
2007-01-21 13:17:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The gender and color of America's next President have no relevance to, or bearing on, his/her being, perhaps, the Greatest President America could ever have. It only matters if the President can really communicate with the American People, and truly understands, acts successfully and in good faith for the American People, defends the American philosophies that had made America a great leader historically, and defends, in good faith, the American Consitution, and is able to lead the World without wobbling like a sleazy jellyfish and rushing to gush out its poison ink before he/she stops to use his/her brain to think with wisdom!
It's about time the TV Pundits stop indulging in their stupid and foolish guessing game on who is supposedly the better candidate at this time and even before the candidates take the opportunity to communicate with the American People and answer their questions. It's not how the Candidates answer to the TV media pundits or to the special interests' questions that matters. It is how they respond to the American Public that matters!
The candidate who is willing to spend more time with the American People, and lesser time with the media pundits and special interests, will very likely be better off to get his/her messages across to the voters. The media and special interests' pundits had, with their proven records of past false info, misrepresentation and poor analysis, had hookwinked the majority of American People in 2000 and 2004 into voting for an INCOMPETENT president into the White House. They are the last people on Earth for voters to trust. They are downright miserable with their judgement.. getting themselves excited and panicky as if they are acting out a fictionalized drama show to get their own few minutes of acting fame!
Let the Presidential candidates visit with and speak diectly to the American People, and respond directly to their answers. Let the media's sole purpose be to air or to report on these meetings.
And let not the Voters be again be cheated out of their own individual analysis - as in 2000 and 2004 - by the enormously high-priced commercial ads that are nothing more than fictionalized political drama shows created by some highly creative and imaginative minds to drive up profits for their advertising corporations.
2007-01-21 13:38:00 · answer #3 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No pros, no Cons. Condi Rice would be a great president. I probably wouldn't vote for senator Clinton. But she would make as good a president as any
2007-01-21 13:13:29 · answer #4 · answered by DylisTN 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it would be a wonderful change, but not Hilary. Wish Condi would run. A very smart woman I would be happy to vote for.
2007-01-21 13:05:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
As long as they are not sexist toward males I don't have a problem.
Actually someone intelligent like Rice would be great.
2007-01-21 13:02:25 · answer #6 · answered by AlienJack J 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd love to see a woman president...Connecticut's Jodi Rell would make a great one.!!!!!
2007-01-21 13:02:21 · answer #7 · answered by MIGHTY MINNIE 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Trust would be completely gone
How can anyone trust someone who bleeds for 7 days and doesn't die
2007-01-21 13:08:13 · answer #8 · answered by bob b 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We just need a president that won't bleed us dry of money and kill American service people. Age, sex, and color don't matter.
2007-01-21 12:53:16 · answer #9 · answered by redunicorn 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
look at what happend when we had maggie thatcher in england she was a tyrant we still hate her now
2007-01-21 13:19:11 · answer #10 · answered by andrew w 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋