2007-01-21 04:12:00 · 4 answers · asked by curdrice2 3 in Sports ➔ Olympics
SACHIN the little master or master balster cannot be compared to LARA because they both have done masters in their own fields, like LARA can never be like SACHIN in odi's similarly SACHIN cannot be like LARA in tests and the main reason is that SACHIN plays for the team not for himself, LARA also plays for his team but getting a 400 in a test will just result in a draw and in that case the team will be affected so as a whole we can say that LARA is a very good player in both one day's and test's but SACHIN is still better than him.
2007-01-21 04:55:46 · answer #1 · answered by Raunaq S 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I guess never if you look at lara he surpass the higest score in one ining in a test or fist class way back in the beginning of his carear but mr sachin despite all the centuries in test or one day he score his first double century after i think 20 centuries,one more thing we need to look also that mostly when ever lara score
100 + there is every chance his team wins the match but for sachin mostly it is a draw or his team loses.
2007-01-22 02:34:43 · answer #2 · answered by wicky 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
may i ask you something?how can you compare sachin wth lara?
lara is a great player in tests.can you say sachin is a boaring player in tests.then how did you compare them both?see sachin have his own style in playing unlike any other player in the world.may i ask you i more thing?i sachin weaker player than lara?i don't think so.i think sachin is greater than lara.lara has a footwork which lets him down in many circumstences as compared to sachin.sachin's footwork,abilities etc are to beadmired by any other players.so i think sachin is the greatest player in tests than lara!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-01-25 03:44:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree.
2007-01-21 13:59:36 · answer #4 · answered by ri_ma_bo 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋