dont u think that what i am saying is right?

Question

hi to all

sorry my english is baaaad
.
am a muslem girl
actuclly i feel very bad when i see that the whole world hates my rellegen whithout knowing anything about it

my question is: Do y konw enogh informaition about islam to hate it ??? if yes
what do u know and are u sure that this infrmaition is true

there are bad people every where

u only see the people who your goverment wants you to see

can u tell why the thousends of american people are becoming moslems every year?

Answer 1

I don't hate any one, I practice my ancient traditional Native American ways.I do find however, that the religons of Abraham have caused the globe a whole lot of grief! That being Judeau-Chirtain and yes islamic. Orgamnised religion to me sucks, as if you want a personal relation with the Supreme being, then you don't need a Rabbi, Preacher, Presit or Emam to tell you how to act, think, or what to believe.

Answer 2

The real question you should ask is not whether or not the west knows enough about Islam to hate it. The west does not "hate" Islam because of any of its basic tenants. Instead they hate the people of Islam who are willing to use violence on them through the use of terrorism.

You should be asking if the Islamic fundamentalists who hate the west know enough about it to actually form an educated opinion. I doubt they do. The so called jihad is under false pretenses.

Answer 3

Don't care to know
actions speak louder than words
the actions of your religion tell me
only death, intolerance and more death is all there is to Islam
Now if we heard leaders of the religion condemning the actions of the nazislamic Fascist I may think different, but they do not care to use their voice to condemn evil just make apologies for the Nazislamic Fascist.
So I hate all Muslims and followers of the evil Islam

Answer 4

The whole world doesn't hate your religion. We don't like it when we are blown up by fanatics or when Muslims try to tell us how to live etc. We also don't like it when they threaten to behead people who upset their idea of religion, either.
I have many issues with the Muslim religion, but I don't hate it. I do hate female circumcision, which is barbaric. I do hate prejudice - when somene hates the West simply because their parents do, for example. I do hate women being forced to wear veils, etc.
Many religious people are very narrow minded and bigotted. Are you sure you know enough about other people to be able to understand them?

Answer 5

Hate is born out of ignorance, I am sorry you are meant to feel bad for who and what you are, that is wrong,. Personally I think people believe the misinformation put out to justify what actions they want to take. Again wrong thing to do.

Answer 6

so sorry, but no one is going to take islam or arab states seriously until prominent leaders in BOTH condemn in the most powerful language suicide bombings and terrorism.

like it or not, when people think of islam, they think of 9/11.

islam and primarily islamic nations need to put great distance between the attitude that made 9/11 happen.

until that happens i'm sure that i much care what either islam or arab states think of me or the usa...

Answer 7

I am sorry you feel this way. Yes, there are a lot of bigots out there, but there are a lot of people like me who respect your religion, even if I don't understand it totally. Keep your chin up and surround yourself with like-minded people. Don't pay attention to those who are too ignorant to respect you for who you are.

Answer 8

I think that we know enough. Certainly, not all Muslims are in favor of this latest intifada, but a lot of us failed to see many Muslims condeming the attacks against the West. Listen to the former Democrat Mayor of New York

Appeasement Never Works
By Ed Koch
Most newspapers have published leaked conclusions from a classified National Intelligence Estimate that said the war in Iraq is fueling a rise in global Islamic terrorism. But only one, at least in New York City, has balanced these conclusions against the contents of a letter "found in the headquarters of Al-Qaeda's leader in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, after he was killed on June 7. The letter was sent to Zarqawi by a senior Al Qaeda leader who signs his name simply 'Atiyah.' He complains that Al Qaeda is weak both in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region and in Iraq." In the letter, 'Atiyan' writes, "Know that we, like all the Mujahadin, are still weak. We are in the stage of weakness and a state of paucity. We have not yet reached a level of stability. We have no alternative but to not squander any element of the foundations of strength, or any helper or supporter." The paper carrying the article was The New York Sun.
The reason I supported President Bush's reelection two years ago was that I believed the Democratic leadership's approach on the war in Iraq was simply wrong. I said I did not think they had the resolve necessary to carry on this battle against an enemy that is willing to wage a war against us for decades to come.
While the NIE conclusions are serious and alarming, e.g., "Although we cannot measure the extent of the spread with precision, a large body of all-source reporting indicates that activists identifying themselves as jihadists, although a small percentage of Muslims, are increasing in both number and geographic dispersion," more important in evaluating success or failure in the war should be the admissions against their interest of the enemy, especially as stated in their internal documents.
In addition, in determining whether or not to remain in Iraq and pursue the enemy there, The New York Sun points out, "...the key judgment of the declassified elements of the [NIE] document also says that winning the war in Iraq would likely reverse the recruitment effect. 'The Iraq conflict has become the 'cause celebre' for jihadists, breeding a deep resentment of the U.S. involvement in the Muslim world and cultivating supporters for the global jihadist movement,' it says. Should jihadists leaving Iraq perceive themselves, and be perceived, to have failed, we judge fewer fighters will be inspired to carry on the fight.'"
It makes no difference in determining our current position whether we were right or wrong to go into Iraq in 2003; we are now there. To those who say, if we were wrong initially, we can never justify staying, I say, ridiculous. The enemy is worldwide Islamic terrorism, and its center today is Iraq. If we were to leave Iraq, would al-Qaeda and other groups allied with it stop their attacks on Americans? Certainly not. We were not in Iraq, nor was George W. Bush our President, when in 1993 Islamic terrorists bombed the World Trade Center killing six and injuring one thousand people; when Islamic terrorists blew up the U.S.S. Cole, killing 13 and injuring 33; when they blew up U.S. Army barracks in Saudi Arabia, killing 19 and injuring 515; when they blew up two American embassies in Africa, causing 257 deaths and 5,000 injuries. We were not in Iraq, and Bush was the President, when Islamic terrorists hijacked and drove passenger planes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon on September 11, 2001, killing some 3,000 people.
The Islamic terrorists have declared their ultimate goals to include the destruction of the U.S. and the takeover of such moderate Arab states as Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf countries. Why do we continue to refuse to believe their stated aims? They couldn't be more clear than Musab al-Zarqawi, the number one al-Qaeda operative in Iraq before he was killed by a U.S. airstrike, who stated before his death, "Killing the infidels is our religion, slaughtering them is our religion, until they convert to Islam or pay us tribute."
If we withdraw from Iraq, we would only embolden al-Qaeda and its allies. Sadly, some of our European allies have already caved to the jihadists. After Islamic terrorists blew up the Madrid commuter trains, killing 191 and injuring 1,500, Spain's government withdrew its soldiers from Iraq. England, a part of the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq, had its subways and a bus bombed with 52 dead and 700 injured. Because Tony Blair is still Prime Minister, England has not yet succumbed to the terrorists' demands to withdraw from Iraq. However, many Laborites have demanded Blair's head and he has agreed to resign within a year. I believe that the future leaders of the Labor Party have decided they will withdraw from Iraq in order to appease the Islamic terrorists. The Conservative party, no longer led by Margaret Thatcher, a great friend of the U.S., appears headed down the same appeasement path as the New Labor Party. I hope I am in error in that conclusion. France has already flinched in the face of threats by the Iranian government, led by its president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and has abandoned efforts to prevent Iran from acquiring the nuclear bomb. Iran has publicly stated its intentions -- when it has the bomb. Ahmadinejad has said, Israel must be "wiped off the map," and "...God willing, with the force of God behind it, we shall soon experience a world without the United States and Zionism," according to a quote published by Iran's state news outlet.
So, to sum up, using an old boxing expression, "You can run, but you can't hide." I believe it makes no sense to run from the terrorists and wait for them to find us in Fortress America, and then seek to repel them. The battle must be taken to them in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, wherever they threaten the free world. This is without a doubt a war to defend the free world and Western civilization, just as important to our survival as World War II. Unlike the latter, which for us lasted four years, this war will go on for decades.
The war has already taken an enormous toll on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as all the innocent Iraqi and Afghan civilian lives that have been lost. We cannot let the sacrifices of the fallen and the living be in vain.
How long will it be before we all awaken to the inherent danger facing us? Appeasement never works. It only encourages new and escalating demands.
Ed Koch is the former Mayor of New York City.