English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

No one is forcing anything.The good people over there want Democracy, the terrorists there don't..

2007-01-21 03:54:36 · answer #1 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 1 0

I think that most of the exploding is being done by the extremist in Iraq and not the USA. As far as forcing them, no one can be forced. I sure hope you do not think that if we left today that the killing would stop. It won't ! Then how will people like you blame the USA . You will say we should help them. Do not give the extremist an excuse to kill so people like you can blame the Americans for the killings. Most of the killings in Iraq are Muslims killing Muslims.

2007-01-21 11:23:56 · answer #2 · answered by meathead 5 · 2 0

Is that what they're saying we are doing? Bombing and forcing democracy? Who is saying this?

How about stopping a global problem before it gets larger? Does that seem like a valid Democratic goal? I think it does.

And you cannot speak niceties with terrorists, by the way.

2007-01-21 11:27:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 3 2

no its dosent -- if the people feel they want democracy - they would get it

we never went to iraq for democracy - if we were out for democracy we would have gotten the saudis first - but since theyre our allies and have oil - they can supress democracy all the want - we went to iraq for oil and middle eastern control

2007-01-21 11:32:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, but this is the agenda... whenever a country falls out with this administration, it pursues the old line 'we have to encourage DEMOCRACY in such-and-such'... it goes back to the cold war, and there's a huge psychological battle between the western and eastern blocs over areas like poland, uzbekistan, the ukraine...

2007-01-21 11:22:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Yes it does. Political scientiest for almost a half a century have shown that democracies rarely, if ever, declare war upon each other. Tyrants, however, often do.

2007-01-21 11:24:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

If they have a history of violence against others, especially against allies, Yes.

2007-01-21 11:24:08 · answer #7 · answered by Luchador 4 · 2 0

William G. Weaver, JD, PhD – Former Army Signals Intelligence officer. Currently Director of Academic Programs, Institute for Policy and Economic Development, University of Texas, El Paso, specializing in executive branch secrecy policy, governmental abuse, and law and bureaucracy. Author of several books on law and political theory.

Essay 9/5/06: Regarding the 9/11 Commission - "In their responsibility to report all the facts: They either refused to interview all relevant experts and witnesses, or, they censored the reports provided to them by those with direct and first-hand information. Both these acts were selective and intentional. Contrary to their pledge to establish accountability: They refused to hold anyone accountable and lamely justified it by saying, “We don’t want to point a finger at anyone." http://www.nswbc.org


Bio: http://academics.utep.edu/Default.aspx?tabid=21347

2007-01-21 11:19:45 · answer #8 · answered by dstr 6 · 2 5

It only changes the political landscape. Iraq is anything, except democratic or free.

2007-01-21 11:21:59 · answer #9 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 1 2

Only when you don't want them to make your country undemocratic!

2007-01-21 11:26:21 · answer #10 · answered by Brianne 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers