Senator Hillary Clinton is reported 41% of a chance to be voted in as a President. Would you vote for her?

Question

I think she has a strong political background. And is clear on foreign policies and treaty's. I think she brings a vast variety of experiences with her. Why don't we give women in this country the chance to run for the highest office of this United States? I would vote for her, would you?

Answer 1

Absolutely. I'm thrilled that she has announced. The only problem I currently have is that the Senate (of which she is a member) is not discussing impeachment. Edwards, therefore, has peaked my interest, but when it comes down to it, I've been hoping for Hillary for 8 years now. I won't jump ship.

Go Hill!

Answer 2

i think of Hillary Clinton has the main suitable danger at being president. looks like she'll runaway with the Democratic nomination barring some extensive, discrediting controversy. The Republicans do no longer look to have a candidate to rally their base at the back of. i think of we are waiting for a woman president, nevertheless i'm uncertain if we are waiting for Pres. Hillary. whilst she won't be respected as a woman, she will have the skill to be respected as president of america. Our economic and protection rigidity skill can purely be disregarded by way of the insane or stupid. As for females electorate, i'm one guy who's leaning in the direction of Hillary. She's craftier than while her husband grow to be president and is conscious the thank you to oil the wheels of political machines to get issues carried out. i think of there are extra advantageous applicants accessible, yet while the presidency comes all the way down to Clinton vs. Guiliani or Clinton vs. Romney like that's looking, my vote is for Hillary.

Answer 3

For some reason I just lack a trust in her ability....I ran, and won a much smaller office for Mayor of a town....that is the only time I have ever voted for a woman......lol
But back to this, its not her being a woman, or Obama being black....none of that really matters does it? its more of what we need in leadership in these hard times now.
I'm a person that votes for the best candidate that at the time I think we can get out of other choices...both parties have had their wrongs...saying is Rep get us in wars and you lose jobs...dem get us jobs etc...but now our major issue is how bad our country is doing on our foreign policy and security....Rice would be more to my liking also but she is a Bush woman I am afraid.....Rudi handled NYC and a crisis in a professional, major undertaking so he right now at least looks good....have to get closer to research and listen to say for sure,....but no I won't vote for HIllary

Answer 4

41% isn't good enough. Nominating her now would guarantee a win for the other candidate. Sooner or later we'll have to get over this, somehow, and we're getting closer but not close enough. Same thing with racial issues -- only a little different because the first black president's biggest challenge will be staying alive while the first woman's main challenge will be getting there.

Answer 5

You need to check reality. She has done a Kerry Style flip flop and tried to convince the country that Bill was not doing wrong. Her inability to organize on program (Health Care Reform) displayed her lack of skills needed for the big office. Sorry She will not get my vote and despite the Clinton powers I think she will fall short for the nomination.

Answer 6

Well...... Lets consider first of all that the Clinton's ARE liars...... and I'm certainly NOT voting for this Clinton package of lies!

Hillary has high negative ratings. There are a lot of people that REALLY dislike her these are a few of the reasons:

-- Hillary is the liberal media's sweetheart, but not America's sweatheart
-- The Clintons LIE and her husband was impeached for lying and committing purjury
-- Her failed healthcare program under her husband
-- Her shrieking voice that grates on people
-- She doesn't look presidential
-- She is very liberal even more than her husband, but bends (lies) politically to pick up votes and reverts back. This is called a "phony."
-- This would bring her husband back into politics and many people do not like that idea.
-- Her husband also has high negative approval ratings.
-- White Water fraud

We've had almost twenty years of the clinton-bush dynasty. Aren't we ready for a freakin break? If we vote in the shrieking b-i-t-c-h, the dynasty could go to almost THIRTY years. Then Jeb Bush could add another eight years??! We need a change!!!

Answer 7

Who says she has a 41% chance? Quote your source, which is probably bogus. There's a lot of Democrats who can't stand the thought of Hillary in the White House, and it looks like the majority of the people that have responded to your question agree..

Answer 8

If Giuliani were to run in the same election year as Clinton, I would vote for Giuliani first. If you can run NYC, you can run pretty much anything, in my opinion. And while Clinton was there while her husband was in office, I don't think the rest of America is ready to elect a female. However, I'd love to see Obama in office.

Answer 9

I would not vote for her, she seems to power hungry to me. Just look when Bill got out of office. They did not move back to Arkansas because she knew she could not get voted in as Senator for that state. So they move to New York where there is a big Democrat support in that state. So she was easily shooed in. I am not against a woman being President. Just not her.

Answer 10

HELL no I wouldn't for her. All she will do is lie her way to the White House just like all the other former presidents did. Just because she has a strong background doesn't mean she will make a good president.