I'm a moderate democrat. I'm a little peeved over Hillary Clinton's denial of her interests and intent over the past 2-3 years to run for the presidency. It makes me wonder, if she can't be honest with her intentions, can we trust her as commander in chief? In the past, every time she was asked about running, she pretty much said no, but hell no. Why couldn't she have just said "maybe" or "I'm not ready to talk about it yet"
Instead of blatantly lying?
Do you think this makes her look bad from the start?
2007-01-21 02:25:10 · 15 answers · asked by Rosebee 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Mimi...
As a good Democrat you aren't suppose to feel this way. You aren't suppose to ask questions like this and you are always suppose to claim that anything said over 5 minutes ago is up for interpretation. Lies are only the thing the "other side" does. Sorry Mimi, but this kind of philosophy is an artform of the Democrat Party. I was one. I was an elected Democrat to a publicly held office. I got out of the ratrace while I could still look in a mirror at night and like the person I saw looking back at me. I am not going to say that all Republicans are immune from this but there is a undeniable difference between the two.
Hillary started running for the Presidency the day she took out the necessary petitions to run for her Senate seat the first time.
To the people who like Hillary- nothing she ever has done or will do will make her look bad. To the people who dislike Hillary, there isn't a thing the woman could ever do to convince them she is anything but a crook, liar and potential accomplice of murder. Literally.
Hillary is the worst of the worst. Bill was small potatos compared to the wrath that Hillary is going to bring down on the Democrat Party. For those who think GW Bush has been polarizing to our Nation. You ain't seen nothing yet.
2007-01-21 03:06:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well...... Lets consider that the Clinton's ARE liars...... and I'm certainly NOT voting for this Clinton package!
Hillary has high negative ratings. There are a lot of people that REALLY dislike her these are a few of the reasons:
-- Hillary is the liberal media's sweetheart, but not America's sweatheart
-- The Clintons LIE and her husband was impeached for lying and committing purjury
-- Her failed healthcare program under her husband
-- Her shrieking voice that grates on people
-- She doesn't look presidential
-- She is very liberal even more than her husband, but bends (lies) politically to pick up votes and reverts back. This is called a "phony."
-- This would bring her husband back into politics and many people do not like that idea.
-- Her husband also has high negative approval ratings.
-- White Water fraud
We've had almost twenty years of the clinton-bush dynasty. Aren't we ready for a freakin break? If we vote in the shrieking b-i-t-c-h, the dynasty could go to almost THIRTY years. Then Jeb Bush could add another eight years??! We need a change!!!
2007-01-21 02:28:06 · answer #2 · answered by charles 3 · 7⤊ 1⤋
i individually help John Edwards. yet I look between the few. I additionally do help the two Hillary and Obama as nicely. i might relatively vote for Hillary nonetheless using fact she has greater journey. in spite of this nonetheless i do no longer think journey is a considerable ingredient interior the fulfillment of a president. i'm in basic terms greater confident in Hillary as she has shown her skill to steer and has finished lots for our us of a. i think of you could %. despite candidate that appeals to you.
2016-10-31 22:02:06 · answer #3 · answered by hinch 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She had to eep her focus on the job she was doing and stop people from atering her about "what if". Plus in politics you can not aways let the cat out of the bag.
Besides maybe she had no plans to run, but seeing how many pople believe in her made her consder it, it costs a small (no a large) fortune to run for office.
2007-01-21 02:37:02 · answer #4 · answered by Kdude 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She was glorifying in the hype of people wanting her. She thought she would be the darling star for the Democrats. I bet her boxer shorts are in a bunch that better democratic candidates dared run against her. I will LOVE hearing her concession speech when she loses the nomination.
If the Democrats somehow are stupid enough to nominate her, they should not complain about whatever Republican gets the presidency.
Hillary Rotten Clinton CANNOT and WILL NOT win. Nominating her would be a waste for the party.
2007-01-21 02:31:11 · answer #5 · answered by Git r' done 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
She is a LIAR!! The only reason she is interested is so she can make history as being the first female president of these not so united states and who else knows what she has on her own egotistic and evil agenda.
2007-01-21 05:44:21 · answer #6 · answered by . 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it's just called politics. If you've been following it for a long time, you would realize that whenever the press starts asking people if they will run or not, that usually means they will.
2007-01-21 02:47:13 · answer #7 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and not to mention finding the White Water papers that she claimed she didnt have.Too many lies with her.
I hope Sandy will use spell check in the future.
2007-01-21 02:34:39 · answer #8 · answered by jnwmom 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
That depends on what your definition of the word "Is" is...
If the masses of lemmings swallowed that garbage, it won't matter if she promises to raise the dead. Oh wait, I forgot, they already do that via voter fraud.
2007-01-21 03:10:13 · answer #9 · answered by Bad Samaritan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is a Clinton and integrity isn't required.
2007-01-21 03:31:57 · answer #10 · answered by Bella 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋