copper and tin, from which bronze is made, were easier to mine and smelt than iron - although iron was actually more plentiful. Eventually means of smelting and forging iron were worked out, and it gradually came to replace bronze as it was more useful. But the Bronze and iron ages did overlap, and even in Britain there is evidence of both being used on the eve of the Roman conquest.
2007-01-21 02:35:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tony B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bronze replaced into formerly used to make kit using fact its melting factor is under that of iron. The Iron Age began with the form of better temperature smelting concepts. around 1800 BC, for motives yet unknown to archaeologists, tin grew to grow to be scarce interior the Levant, inflicting a decline in bronze production. Copper, additionally, got here to be quickly furnish. as a effect, pirate communities around the Mediterranean, from around 1800–1700 BC onward, began to attack fortified cities in seek of bronze, to remelt into weaponry. Bronze replaced into lots greater significant interior the era in the previous the twelfth to tenth century and that's cautioned that a scarcity of tin, as a effect of the commerce disruptions interior the Mediterranean in the present day, compelled peoples to look for an option to bronze. The Iron Age interior the classic close to East is assumed to have started with the invention of iron smelting and smithing concepts in Anatolia or the Caucasus interior the late 2nd millennium BC (circa 1300 BC).
2016-10-31 22:01:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by hinch 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because Iron requires a lot more heat to make than does
bronze....Furnace technology needed to develop....
2007-01-21 02:19:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋