English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

I don't think they really hate either one. I think its hate for the sake of hate. I haven't seen hate like this sense I was kid in the 50's-60's. White people used too hate black people like this. The white people didn't really hate the black people. They didn't even know the black people. But just being able to hate something like this makes people feel better about themselves. They have such low self esteem that hate helps them feel better when they hate something so bad. They really should seek some mental health care.

2007-01-21 02:09:12 · answer #1 · answered by Tropical Weasel 3 · 2 2

think approximately to be kidding! strengthen up! Why is it the media's fault to coach Bush's blunders, missteps, faults, problems along with his regulations etc.? Sorry, toddler, yet this is the yankee way. He had it waaaay too elementary in his first term and the media enable his each and every pass slide; now that they are doing their job (aside from FOX) and reporting issues AS they are that's a difficulty???? the yankee media could be independent (in assessment to FOX) and positively be a watchdog for the yankee public. If Georgie Porgy is screwing up, the media has an obligation to let us know. they don't seem to be making it "cool" to dislike him; the country and the media is now no longer on a honeymoon with him. we've awoken from the Kool-aide that we swallowed in Nov 2000 that made us have faith despite that guy suggested. that's a stable factor. this is the way it relatively is going to be. No president could have the media in his pocket. No president could be so useful that his be conscious is regulation. he isn't a King.

2016-10-31 21:59:44 · answer #2 · answered by hinch 4 · 0 0

Good question. It hits the target but not the mark.
Media liberals are linguistically educated socialists, their political counter-parts are college under-educated/ or hippie drop-out socialists.
Answer,Both! Striving to prove and make work a system that has failed mankind since recorded history...But They! The intellectual elite, smarter than the majority that retain some clarity, know better and believe in their own mind that they are superior.
They side with all that reject individualism and, in an effort to extort their will over the masses...Would Embrace even the Anti-Christ...Full kiss, tongue included upon lifting its tail, to achieve their perversion.

2007-01-21 03:09:08 · answer #3 · answered by David N 2 · 0 0

Liberals...anyone opposed to bush is an immediate liberal?
what about the republicans that are turning on him now because hes reached all time stupidity.

I am a former soldier thats all.
liberal conservative rep dem, Nope.
Im just some one who calls it like I see it.
Read the papers, watch the hearings, follow the progress, and smart enough to keep away from FOX network
unless I want to see a singing monkey then I tune in for the oreily dude

Why hate bush -- lok at the mess hes created.
And not only that, the manner in which he created it and tried to cover it up.

Hey you want to fight terrorism, okay...go on Tv and say why you need to take action.
But dont hide your intentions
thats the most insulting thing about this president
He decieves, manipulates

thats why people from his own party have grown to despise his efforts

As far as his religious beliefs.
Well that was no doubt publical declared at a proper time to try to win support in one way or the other
Last I heard there was a separation of 'church'; and state and religion should have nio bearing on his competence or lack of demonstrated of running this ountry.
Its people like you who want to cloud the true issue of his failure as a true leader who cares for his constinuents any way you can.

P.S.
I love the liberal based media comment
Well anyone who pays attention can see that some networks will report both sides success and failures and will criticize both equally.
whereas some networks ..cough FOX .. has such a one sided view of government that anyone can see if they look at it carefully
For too long people have trusted News was news.
But now hopefully they can see how bad some networks are ..
and the propaganda tactics used to keep the public unaware of whats truly going on.

P.S.
Man, what kind of hold does bush have on these people that stay loyal to him amidst his utter disaster?
Please tell me youve been locked in a cave or your satellite company only gives you the FOX network as your source of news..because no one can remain this ignorant, can they?

2007-01-21 02:09:02 · answer #4 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 2 3

It stems from many things, one of the most important is 'Liberals' base opinions on feelings. When facts and real world experience are absent, Americas youth, is vulnerable to ideology of their liberal professors. NBC, who's upper management is very liberal minded, daily represent their bias in their media coverage. The New York Times is a carbon copy of this propaganda, I use the word propaganda because when the facts, in proper context to current events are ignored, their media is nothing more than editorial in it whole. Now of course the neo-libs will disagree with this, but fact is fact.

2007-01-21 02:11:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Truely, the liberal press and the liberals, in general do not hate George W. Bush. They dissagree with him and that is far from hatred. While you rae throwing words about, you might want to look up facism in a dictionary. You would find that facist is a bit better description of the GWB administartion than most Islamic states. I doubt that anyone has a problem with King George's Christianity. It would be nice if he practiced it a bit more instead of professing it.

2007-01-21 02:10:04 · answer #6 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 3 4

The war Bush is fighting is in his head. Really, I'd be surprised if he even knows what a Muslim is, but I am sure he knows what fascism is, considering he practices it on a daily basis. His profession of Christianity is merely words and a smoke screen to keep the extreme radical factions of his own party in line. In essence, do Christians judge a man by his words or his deeds?

2007-01-21 02:10:34 · answer #7 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 1 3

The press has been called liberal for so long now people have come to believe it .
There is nothing liberal about a story in the media until some one says I support that view .
Who is always trying to get, laws passed ,judges removed ,sentenced convicts harsher punishments ,supported the Dubi ports deal ,and bashes other media outlets for being the so called liberal press .
Whats wrong with the New York Times coming out against people looking at your bank accounts .
Maybe we should Tap phones in an effort to snare terrorists without proper court orders just because we feel the need .
I am sick and tired of everyone calling the press liberal .If anything as I see it the media slants pro Israel ,pro military spending ,pro death penalty , pro banning gay marriage ,pro keeping homosexuals out of the military ,pro religion , pro tax cuts , pro tax credits , pro school vouchers , pro privatizing social security .pro big government spending .
When you read the local and national news combined with the editorial page your view of the so called liberal media changes .
When I see a bond issue for new construction funded by tax payers that directly enhances private enterprise I wonder just how liberal something like that is . It benefits only the wealthy which so called liberals want to tax to death .Seems the rich get a break paid for by the poor here so liberals would be against such a bond Issue . Local government funds study to widen road or build bridge 8 million dollars allocated for the study .
Then a year later you see bridge expansion is moving forward despite the efforts of local activists who opposed the bond Issue and the xyz corporation who donated 300,000 to the campaign of the mayor who was awarded the contract .
While government expands and moves forward on all fronts ,so called liberals like myself are forced to endure higher local property taxes and payroll deductions due to expanded services to benefit the richest segment of the community . This often in the face of large numbers of homeless ,high crime ,and a local government doing little about it .
Seems if the press was liberal it would support efforts of local food pantries and provide services for those in a transitional phase of life .
Instead I read stories of police closing down free food distribution by local students who began helping the homeless . Anyhow I do not see the press as liberal only trying to push the conservative agenda forward supporting war and ending freedoms .

2007-01-21 02:26:58 · answer #8 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 0 3

None of the two..as he has created more terrorist and he doesn't represent Christianity.. the Bush presidency is simply a failure..
and don't fool your self.. quite a few conservative groups feel the same !

2007-01-21 02:04:51 · answer #9 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 2 4

They hate most the (R) after his name.

2007-01-21 02:16:45 · answer #10 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers