English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am not a Cherie Blair fan but why is the Mail so psychotically obsessed with her that they continually post huge front page headlines about the most trivial news items regarding her ? I have seen everything from "Cherie goes shopping but a friend pays for her" ( when visiting a village store ) to stuff even more banal than that such as this weeks claim that she supposedly told civil servants she had the right to perks ! Is this really the most important news item of the week ?
Who is the mentally unstable editor who has such a hate complex obsession about the rather uninteresting woman and is he seeking psychiatric help ?

2007-01-21 01:05:51 · 10 answers · asked by miguel b 1 in News & Events Media & Journalism

10 answers

The Mail is a vile and slimy racist bit of bogpaper.
In the 30's they put the boot into the Jews while idolising Hitler,
In the 50's they attacked the Irish,
In the 60's the tried to marginalise the blacks,
In the 70's and 80's it was the turn of the Asians to get the brunt of the Mail's racist hatred,
And now it is the turn of immigrants of all nationalities to get lied about, especially Muslim immigrants.
They are an obscenity and are disgusting psychopathic fascist asswipes

2007-01-21 01:51:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

You are wrong, it is justifiable to keep on her case. She constantly exploits her husbands position in a totally unprecedented way. Prime ministers spouses should be seen and not heard, because THEY have not been elected to office, and they should not use their spouses position to espouse their own political views (feminist and left wing and supporter of the Human Rights Act). She is constantly accused of having a conflict of interest regarding the promotion of the HRA and the EU in general, because her job earns her a considerable income from it, including defending immigrants. Do you think that she would be able to earn large fees from foreign lecture tours if she wasn't the PM's wife? She also isn't backward in giving us her political opinions when her feminist sensitivities have been outraged. No previous spouse has ever done that.

In your passive defense of her behaviour, you forget that the receiving of benefits and gifts (including alleged free holidays) could very easily be construed as, I want something back for it. This is particularly relevant when there is in place an ongoing police investigation regarding cash for honours at this very moment.

She sells herself as friends of various victim groups, and generally sells the idea that she is the friend of the downtrodden. However, contrast that with the lifestyle that the Blairs enjoy as friends of the rich and famous, including pop stars etc. who are entertained at downing street, together with the ownership of an expensive property in London. A little hypocrytical, but then aren't all 'left wingers' when they are tempted with the reality of money and fame.

I certainly don't think that the MAIL & MAIL ON SUNDAY news papers are obsessed with CB, she doesn't feature that often. Her husbands Government, and its dismal failures, do get extensive coverage, quite rightly, because these newspapers are amongst the very few, including the TV media, that are prepared to let the people know what is going on.

Judging by the other responses above, ( I don't know about those that will follow) I don't know why I bothered. Vacuous and crass, with no supporting argument.

2007-01-21 02:20:40 · answer #2 · answered by Veritas 7 · 1 1

Cheri is a extreme courtroom determine and he or she or he could desire to could desire to rule alongside with the lands rules- and this usa rules are very very final- he could be deported even on the hands of Cheri Blair - he could desire to take his important different and youthful toddlers and flow abode and help them. Cheri now now no longer could desire to be worrying or diplomatic now her hubby isn't splendid minister. the united kingdom has toughened up on unlawful assylum seekers and not interior the previous time too.

2016-11-25 23:51:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They are jealous and threatened by a successful, intelligent woman. Although if she's that intelligent, makes you wonder why she's stuck with Tony 'War Monger' Blair so long.

Plus, by slagging her off, the editors are hoping some of the revulsion they aim to create rubs off on her hubby.

P.S. I never read that paper.

2007-01-21 01:21:33 · answer #4 · answered by Roxy 6 · 2 2

The Daily Mail and the Sunday version is the WORST newspaper gutter tabloid in Britain.
They are women haters to the core.
Crowing liars and thieves.
They clearly hold Mrs Blair in even higher contempt as she is simply the Pm's wife.
Don't buy the mail is my advice, then you won't know who they are attacking.
I never buy it unless I am in it. and I have taken them to court and won.
They make me SICK. They do not reflect the views of the British Public except the very snide and worm like maggots.

2007-01-21 01:22:14 · answer #5 · answered by ktbaron 3 · 4 2

For the same reason the tabloids have been obsessed with Big Brother all week - cos it sells newspapers.

2007-01-21 01:50:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The Mail is tory newspaper - hence they try and stir up the other parties.

2007-01-21 02:13:43 · answer #7 · answered by S B 2 · 2 1

She is a fat shapeless cow with a mouth like the slot in a postbox.

2007-01-21 01:17:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

She has strange teeth.

2007-01-21 01:13:40 · answer #9 · answered by Mighty C 5 · 0 2

You read that paper....gosh

2007-01-21 01:10:49 · answer #10 · answered by ellietricitycat 4 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers