Yes, I agree with you-our President has many more things going for him than against him--he has heart.
2007-01-21 01:13:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by smeezleme 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
It's not sanctity of human life until you address the issue of what happens to the child AFTER it is born.
You tell me how you plan to deal with the Crack Babies, abused children, malnourished children, children born with known disorders such as Dow syndrome, and I am quite willing to listen to the "Sanctity of life" part. Up until then, I call it being a hypocrite.
2007-01-21 02:07:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by diogenese19348 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
ofcourse, the death of a man who was responsible for the deaths of thousands is fair.
Saddam killed 140 persons in Iraq.. so he definately deserves this punishment...
but Mr. Bush killed more than 1,40,000 innocent people in Afghanistan.. what punishment does he deserve then??
my suggestion is that, our president Bush wanted to rob and acquire the oil wealth of iraq.. and he's done that atlast..
Saddam got his punishment.. ok.. accepted
but still Bush is enjoying himself...THINK... actually.. the question must be.. " why should Bush interfere himself in the affairs of Iraq??" Saddam was hanged under the pressure of US... and thats the most unfair one..
BEING ONE OF THE YAHOO ANSWER WE SHOULD BE GENUINE BY ALL THE ANSWER WHICH WE GIVE. IT WAS VERY CLEAR THAT THE COURT WHICH HAS DECIDED DEATH PLENTY FOR SUDDAM WAS NOT AN INDEPENDENT COURT IT WAS UNDER THE PRESSURE OF USA'S GOVERNMENT. !!
Hanging of a General, for vicious reasons, or grudge, without any fair trial, most unfair.lowest and most inhuman act. Why is everybody picking on poor SADDAM?
no one's execution is fair,(Saddam for example)
well even if we assume that he must be punished for what saddam did, then what about mr.bush! he has been trying to be the BIG BROTHER of this WHOLE WORLD, what the uno and other international organisations are about, must be rediscussed in the present lopsided world! !!.
2007-01-21 02:48:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by mariya 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
i think its disappointing that he's so conservative and won't support stem cell research. The scientists aren't even testing embryo's, they're just clusters of 8 cells that haven't even developed germ layers yet. Plus they'd just be burned in an incinerator if they aren't used for research, which would just kill them anyway. I think that the benefits of stem cell research are being denied to us by our idiot President who doesn't even really know what he's taking a stand against.
2007-01-21 01:14:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Good I like that! But also I ask what about the sanctity of life of the tens or hundreds of thousands of innocent people killed by his attack on Iraq .
2007-01-21 01:48:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by oldtreeplanter 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Do the lives of thousands of innocents in Iraq, Palestine and Afghanistan which have been taken under the banner of "collateral damage" count? That's rather hypocritical dont you think?
Peace and Love
2007-01-21 04:29:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by mil's 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
President Bush is doing very good. I support him 100%.
2007-01-21 01:16:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by kenn 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
I thank god that he is gone in 2 years time.
2007-01-21 14:14:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by thevillageidiotxxxx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shame he is only pro life BEFORE they are born, would be better if he was PRO LIFE after birth, maybe he is PRO LIFE, so he can send more people into pointless wars and thus ENDING their right to Pro Create, hmmmm now I think about it, he is ANTI life
2007-01-21 02:07:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
because of the fact he did the wear and tear to united statesa. and their own u . s . a . seems unfair i think of he polishing off each and every human beings hatred and Its in direction of muslims i in my opinion dislike that, they have each and every remarkable to stay their lives the way they desire to too.
2016-11-25 23:51:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋