umm... i like aamir khan in fanaa.. i don't like ajay devgan and i definitely HATE r. roshan!!! :()[[whatever the spelling]]... i think aamir deserves it, he's kinda gud luking [[i didn't watch the SSA though!]]
2007-01-21 00:12:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by pinkangel_232 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was really suprised when Hrithik got the screen award for acting. I was expecting either Aamir Khan or Ajay Devgan to win. First of all Kkrish is not Koi Mil Gaya. Hrithik acted damn good in Koi Mil Gaya and he had to win that year. But Kkrish was nothing compared to Rang De Basanti and Omkara. Kkrish was a good effort for introducing india's first onscreen superhero. But it can also be said the movie was made for school going kids. His acting was normal in the movie. There was nothing outstanding about it. It could be seen that in an effort to obtain more profits Rakesh Roshan made hrithik to perform gr8 stunts and dance sequences which attracted people rather than focussing on Hrithik's acting. Hrithik did not deserve to win this year.
2007-01-25 02:18:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A best actor should be judged by his histronics, how he gets into the skin of the character he is portraying.
No offence, if you look at Hrithik's movies, the poor fellow has been victimised. Since he is such a good dancer, they have captalised on his dances and songs rather than giving him a chance to act. Even his own father should stop worrying about his production house for a change and write a good role for his son. Superman, batman or Krrish is not going to get him far enough. Even his contemporaries like Abhishek are wiser with such films as Guru.
When we talk of acting, we should think of a movie starring Hrithik minus his dancing potential. So, to come back to your question, Krrish according to me was a mediocre attempt....about why he is getting awards?, well may be his Dad can tell!
2007-01-24 00:08:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by R 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Hrhitik is a superb actor and he deserves for the best actor award.Acting is not only related with dialouges.You have many other parameters in which an actor will be rated for the award like dancing,etc.
2007-01-23 00:28:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rama P 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the Current Year for which Hritik was awarded the Awards, None other Performance got the Such over whelming response from the Audience.
2007-01-21 08:19:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by AVANISH JI 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Screen Awards is goes to Aamir khan............
he is the person who have the right to do any thing when public demand or not his doesn't matter but his acting his smart work and his effort show in all movies...........
all only need the some shell but he is the person who never need and shell but shell always find him..........
2007-01-21 13:25:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by ravi k 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hrhitik does not deserves to be given a best actor award.But, Abhishek Bachan deservers to be the best actor award as he has performed awesome & to the role in GURU.He has given everything the role was demanding from the character.He has shown his versatality by doing 2 different roles- one in DHOOM & other in GURU. He is the most appropriate & a deserving candidate for the award.
2007-01-21 09:00:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by fancypie 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It should have been some else more deserving for acting capacity. Hritik has done wonder in Dhoom 2, but not through his acting capacity. Rather it was a combination of the capacity of Make-up man, Cameraman, director and of cource, Hritik..it can not be solely credited to hritik.
2007-01-21 11:07:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Yusuf K 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes i agree completely
aamir WAS definitely better
if it was 4 dhoom den ok but 4 kkrish plllllzzzzzzzzz
no way
2007-01-22 14:26:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by doc 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
aamir khan should be awarded due to his performance in fanaa and rang de basanti.........he desereves to get an award.....what is ur opinion?
2007-01-22 04:29:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by cool blue guy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋