what is the difference between Bush and Hitler ?

Answer 1

they are both terrorists....bush is worse than hitler....atleast hitler let his true feelings knowns to the entire world....atleast he was honest....bush gets his terrorist work through lies and manipulating his own citizens!!!

Answer 2

We have the opportunity to stop Bush we failed at stopping Hitler, we waited too long to enter that war? Go to www.history.com WW II? Look it up? Bush has plans all along the lines of the Third Reich mentality the first clue is the Patriot Act, of the New World Order. Otherwise he is short with a little Caesar complex too. And he is a fascist dictator like a little Mussolini too. They both were very anal retentive, which brings me to the close of this memo, Hitler is first in hell in line to get the pineapple suppository, and Bush will be last and least once we beat him at his own game. And Hitler is dead and Bush is alive?

Answer 3

Hitler had a moustache.

But seriously, there is no comparison between the two.
Hitler was a power crazed despot obsessed with ethnic cleansing and expansion of the ayrian cause.
Bush is merely a guy who ended up leading a country in the wrong direction because of faulty information from his advisers.

Hitler bankrupted Germany while Bush has improved the economy of America. Ok.....he spent a lot on the war effort but industry is doing great under his administration.

Answer 4

Hitler was wildly popular with the German people and rallied them against an enemy that had committed no violence in order to conquer new territory.

Bush is not popular but in spite of it still fights those that have attacked us and also liberated a country ruled by a ruthless dictator for the citizens of that nation not our own.

There could not be two more diametrically opposed men to compare.

Answer 5

Did you go to the university of Berlin? As an inadequate job as Mr. Bush has done to even ask that question puts you in the same same category with the likes of Jim Jones, Stalin, Gerbles to name a few.
You need to read more and express yourself less until you, and if ever you are able to discern the facts.

Answer 6

Something tells me you dont know too much about Adolph Hitler.

(1) If you dissagreed with him you were history..meanimg 6ft under.
(2) You have been reading too many left wing bloggers who hate Pres. Bush, otherwise you wouldnt ask this kind of question.
pb.

Answer 7

bush reacted to a real threat of terrorism by engaging the terrorists so they wouldnt attack this country on our own soil. hitler attempted to take over the world via blitzkrieg and ethnic cleansing. bush, as roosevelt did then saw the need to stop ethnic cleansing. by defeating saddam hussein the kurds can now exist as a race rather than systematically be exterminated by saddam and the baath loyalists.

i guarantee you you wont find that in a liberal extremist pelosi press release.
i am curious though as to what your point was supposed to be.

Answer 8

undecided i'm getting this suitable, yet my information is which you assert Bin encumbered had a explanation for killing? if so, you're a entire moron, and by using the way, Hitler killed Jews simply by fact he HATED them, theory them to be no longer almost as good as different Germans.

Answer 9

Main difference at this point could well be just 5 letters. J-A-M-E-S. As evidently you have no clue about anything. Next time you ask a question, why don't you try and ask it before lighting up some of your Wacky Weed. Duhhhh

Answer 10

the difference is in the body count

Bush "a liberator"
US Soldiers 3047;
Enemy kill 55,000;
Civilians 650,000
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/10/AR2006101001442.html
total 708,047 still working for the grand total
are not include the 9/11 victims for leak of evidences
about the conspiracy theory
http://icasualties.org/oif/

Hitler "a conqueror"
Soldiers and Civilians kill grand total 61 million
http://bss.sfsu.edu/tygiel/Hist427/texts/wwiicasualty.htm

Answer 11

Hitler had a mustache; Bush doesn't.