What do you think?
2007-01-20 22:46:18 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Blair has made many more mistakes than that. He has let into Britain over 2million eastern Europeans in the past two years, and there are plenty more going to come. They benefit from Britain because they can learn a useful language, and earn much more money than they would in their own country, however we don't benefit from their countries at all. He puts other nations before his own peoples needs. The British do not benefit from Europe in the same way because most British I know would want to move to the ex-common wealth countries to live and for work such as New Zea land, Australia, Canada or even America. These days its impossible to get a British dentist on the National Health, this is Blair's doings. That is why more people don't like Blair's methods.
2007-01-21 01:28:08 · answer #1 · answered by mellouckili 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think he was threatened - as I believe Harold Wilson was when he refused to commit British troops to Vietnam. The pound collapsed in the late 1960's.
It is quite possible that Mr Blair faced some similar threat to this country's economy.
As for some answerers stating that Mr Blair took the Great out of Britain - that happened many years before he became Prime Minister. We have been in a state of semi collapse since the end of WW2.
Mrs Thatcher did the best work at re-establishing a strong economy but that came with a price too.
2007-01-21 20:32:10 · answer #2 · answered by George 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your call needless to say does not adventure your relatively information. He taken care of out Northern eire, as different posters have suggested, isn't precisely one hundred% actual. confident, he replaced into there on the top and took the credit, yet Mo Mowlam did maximum of it. reasonable politicians in Northern eire did some. and since the tw@t have been given us into an Iraqi conflict on the back of relatively doubtful American intelligence (there's a contradiction in words top there...) he hasn't been useful interior the eyes of the British inhabitants. undergo in innovations, winning 3 elections on the trot replaced into as lots a mirrored image of how hated the Conservative social gathering grew to grow to be for the period of their time in government. than how stable the Labour social gathering replaced into. It additionally could be observed that for many Tony Blair's time in workplace the Conservatives have been under an sufficient opposition and not in any respect a central authority in waiting. And hundreds of thousands of electorate in this us of a undergo in innovations how the Conservatives screwed over the regular public and have not voted for them in two decades. it relatively is loss of a respected option that keeps Labour in potential, no longer Tony Blair.
2016-10-31 21:51:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tony Blair has achieved nothing beneficial to our country in his time in office.The only ppl to benefit are immigrants.
He has broken the back of our economy,taken away our rights,destroyed our education and health systems and taxed us till the pips squeak.
2007-01-20 23:12:02 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think he had the maikings of one. But everyone cant be a Hguh Grant to Billy Bob Thronton (as in the move Love Actually)...especially not when America threatens to cut off all trade agreements and aid to the countries that wont suport it (like they did with France who bravely stood up against them and tried to hold out as long as they could saying Iraq was not a good idea).....I am sure there was pressure brought on Britain and Australia behind doors...too....
They dont call America the Big Bully for nothing you know in inernational circles;)
2007-01-20 22:56:16 · answer #5 · answered by Syn 2 · 0⤊ 5⤋
No,he never,never has been a good prime minister,he always has been shallow and self centred
2007-01-21 00:55:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You were always wrong on that one. His relationship with Bush makes no difference.
2007-01-21 05:24:46 · answer #7 · answered by Veritas 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
history will tell us that tony Blair.was a poodle/self centre/a tool for big company's/and took the great out of great Britain.
2007-01-20 23:14:46 · answer #8 · answered by peter o 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Just because he agrees with George Bush on how to deal with terrorist, you say that. Tony Blair has been of of the strongest and greatest leader for you country.
2007-01-20 22:54:39 · answer #9 · answered by meathead 5 · 2⤊ 6⤋
He also licked Penis Clinton's *** ("back store"). So what's the difference?
2007-01-20 22:51:32 · answer #10 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋