Obama / Edwards or vice versa. I've done research on ALL the candidates, including voting records, PAC's, etc.. This has got to be the only ticket !
2007-01-21 01:30:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The interest payments on the U.S. debt was $406 BILLION in 2006 alone. The debt is currently increasing by $1.49 BILLION per DAY. Your personal share of it is $28,847.94.
Hilary's husband operated with a federal surplus, you know, actually reducing the national debt.
The U.S. economy is nearing freefall. The spending level is irresponsibily out of control. And it's not exactly going to welfare recipients, those programs are state-run and have been hacked to bits. That deficit-spending, your money that you will never get back, is going to increasing subsidies and reducing taxes for the largest corporations and the wealthiest individuals.
Sorry, but a Clinton is probably the U.S.'s best hope for remaining an economic power.
2007-01-21 06:13:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by The angels have the phone box. 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
There are more than 2 democratic candidates, the corporate media wants you to believe already that the choices are limited.
I would vote for Gore/Kucinich.
I know Al says he isn't running, but if we all wrote him in, how could he refuse?
Kucinich
As the candidate already announced and receiving near zero corporate coverage, I view the lack of coverage as an indicator of the corporate fear of his election.
Only candidate with a lick of sense about the war in Iraq.
The only candidate that will withdraw from Iraq.
Check his website, we are not stuck with Hillary.
At least Obama may surprise us, Hillary will not.
2007-01-21 06:25:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jack C 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
As much as I have fought for women's rights, I will NOT vote for Hillary Clinton. I am looking at Obama and know I need to look at a few more.
2007-01-21 05:36:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by towanda 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
Dont worry! The Cast Iron B**CH is about as electable as Britney Spears is tallented!!!
2007-01-21 08:21:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by hardknott2003 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wouldnt go for either one,probably would vote for Tancredo,he's not afraid to tackle the immigration issue which so many on both sides seem to avoid.
2007-01-21 05:39:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by jnwmom 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
I would vote for whoever they were against. Hopefully either Mitt Romney or a 3rd party guy. Our nation needs a third party to stave off the virtual oligarchy we have in place.
2007-01-21 06:12:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Guerrilla M 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
I'd sooner slit my own throat than vote for Hillary Clinton. She is just like her husband and will say or do anything to satisfy her lifelong asspiration of having power. She should be cleaning an office, not holding one.
2007-01-21 05:43:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by stever002 3
·
2⤊
5⤋
Why not elect Nancy Pelousy, then we can criticize her every move. Dirty Harry as VP.
2007-01-21 08:14:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jay J 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would always vote a Clinton into office. i swear i did not have sexual intercourse with that name. they would be great for the American people
2007-01-21 05:39:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by binzee 1
·
2⤊
4⤋