there are both good wrestler but who is BETTER
2007-01-20 20:30:43 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Undertaker
2007-01-21 00:47:00 · answer #1 · answered by 111 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You said "Which WRESTLER is better" so to answer that it's the Undertaker. Cena doesn't have any real in-ring skills, don't get me wrong his mic skills are first class and he is fairly over with the fans but he has a long way to go before he will be anywhere near the ability of the Deadman.
Interesting Fact: The Undertaker is kind of the all knowing Uncle backstage in WWE he's the one guy who all the Young and Upcomings like Cena goto for advice and counsel.
2007-01-21 00:03:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simply stated, The Undertaker.
When it comes to skills and all around in ring ability, you have to look at Taker. And even further than that, look who's most exciting. Cena does nothing crazy except for maybe an extra shoulder block. The Undertaker is a near 7 foot tall and 300 plus pound man who walks on the top rope. Taker is bigger, stronger, and faster than Cena. And the Tombstone Piledriver owns the FU.
So again, in short, The Undertaker.
2007-01-23 19:29:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Undertaker
2007-01-20 22:51:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Grrr... this question makes me offended. For one, i do not understand how the Undertaker and John Cena were given into an identical question interior the first position. The Undertaker is through some distance a more effective powerful wrestler. Cena might want to sturdy on the mike, yet Taker is a miles more effective powerful performer interior the ring. even as Cena wrestles it makes you pick to doze off. by potential of ways, you spelled "which" incorrect.
2016-10-17 02:35:36 · answer #5 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer my wrestlers on the dark side so I would have to go with the undertaker! If Cena turned heel or turned into a darker character i would cheer for him as i think Cena has all the goods to be at the pinnacle of the WWE!
2007-01-20 21:08:23 · answer #6 · answered by Wes B 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Undertaker.
2007-01-20 20:34:28 · answer #7 · answered by Ultimate Fighter 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Undertaker 4 sure. If they fought in real life Undertaker would kill cena. U can see that taker is more technical in his fighting. Cena is good but Taker 4 sure
2007-01-21 02:13:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you idiots first off wrestling isn't fake the wrestling part is real the only thing fake is how everything is pre-determined b4 a match like moves, spots, outcome of course and more and for those retards saying Cena is better you better be a 12 year old kid or a fatass woman who has no male companionship in life Cena is a terrible wrestler hez mic skills are alright and he does get over with the crowd but anyone who knows wrestling knows Cena is a joke hands down id take Taker as he is one of the best pure strikers in wrestling history
2007-01-21 00:18:32 · answer #9 · answered by big ticket 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Undertaker, He beat all the fighters u can ever beat and the fighters back than are better than the ones now. cena didnt have to fight Stone Cold or The Rock Etc. Undertaker fought those fighters
2007-01-20 21:46:14 · answer #10 · answered by Cayden 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋