what is empire?

Question

please tell me all abt empire

Answer 1

Scholars debate what exactly constitutes an Empire (from the Latin "imperium", denoting military command within the ancient Roman government). Generally, they may define an empire as a state that extends dominion over areas and populations distinct culturally and ethnically from the culture/ethnicity at the center of power. There are, however, many types of definitions, including definitions based on economic factors and those based on political factors. The term is most commonly understood to mean that of the military hegemonic power. The United States is currently an economic, cultural, and political empire as its influence extends across the world; however, it is debated whether it truly resembles a militaristic empire. Like other states, an empire maintains its political structure at least partly by coercion. Land-based empires (such as the Mongol Empire or the Achaemenid Persia) tend to extend in a contiguous area; sea-borne empires, also known as thalassocracies (the Athenian, Portuguese, and especially the British empires provide examples), may feature looser structures and more scattered territories.

Empires predate the Romans by several hundred years: Egypt, for example, set up an empire in the 16th century BC by invading and then incorporating Nubia and the ancient city-states of the Levant. The Akkadian Empire of Sargon of Akkad exists as one of the earliest models of a far-flung, land-based empire. Empire contrasts with the example of a federation, where a large, multi-ethnic state — or even an ethnically homogeneous one like Japan or a small area like Switzerland — relies on mutual agreement amongst its component political units which retain a high degree of autonomy. Additionally, one can compare physical empires with potentially more abstract or less formally structured hegemonies, in which the sphere of influence of a single political unit (such as a city-state) dominates a culturally unified area politically or militarily. A second side of this same coin shows in potentially inherent tactics of divide and conquer by different factions ("the enemy of my enemy is my friend") and central intervention for the greater whole's benefit.

Compare also the concept of superpowers and hyperpowers. (Some commentators have seen the British Empire as a hyperpower, in its heyday as the largest empire in world history (covering about 1/4 of the Earth's land surface) with established political, economical, financial, and scientific hegemony over the whole world.)

Answer 2

No, it wasn't. It merely wasn't. Many historians have meditated a topic such as what you're talking of: if the Romans had ever dared to invade East Asia, and maximum agree, inclusive of myself, that the Romans does no longer have labored too properly with the tough environments of the Gobi, and greater effective than possibly could have been pushed returned (whether it extremely is greater of the case whilst talking of China). although, have been the Mongolians combating the Romans on their own turf, pre-invasion, around a hundred advert, then they could have lost, yet for the explanation that the Mongolians utilized a lot the comparable techniques because of the fact the Huns did, Romans of the previous due Empire could have probably got here upon their procedures of conflict unconventional and demanding to combat against, as they did with the Huns. i'm no longer in any way attempting to shrink the magnitude of the Mongolian Empire, it extremely is merely that there have been others, somewhat the Roman Empire, or greater properly the Roman Republic, that held a lot greater needed power than the Mongolians did. EDIT: properly, positioned to play the comparable state of affairs that further the Romans to the knees on the palms of the Huns, and various of different the barbarians used comparable techniques in conflict. The Huns extraordinarily a lot raped actually everyone and burned each and everything they observed each and each of ways from the Steppes to Rome, and that i'm helpful the Mongolians could have completed the comparable. How long could the Romans final? properly, the Roman Empire is seen to have fallen after the Visigoth sacking of Rome, so i think that if the Mongolians had sacked Rome, then the Romans could have technically "lost". you are able to "what if" all you will, yet i understand as a historian that it extremely is demanding to study eventualities regarding conflict between 2 thoroughly diverse civilizations, and attempt to wager the effect.

Answer 3

According to Google, an empire is a group of states or countries ruled by a single supreme authority, known as an emperor or empress.

Answer 4

A song by Queensryche - It rocks!