If the operation were properly compartment-ed, that number with full knowledge would be much, much smaller.
If you were duped into performing some act that seemed legal or innocent enough at the time, then watched the horror that unfolded, would you be in a hurry to blow the whistle? Self incriminate and expose yourself to nearly 3000 counts of murder?
The government was involved in 9/11 cover-up. The 9/11 Commission Report was useless and reads more like a bad Tom Clancy novel than an authoritative government report of the circumstances surrounding the attacks that day.
What secrets are being protected we have no way of knowing. That secrets are being protected is obvious.
In my mind the two biggest from the report are the absolute and complete failure to track the funding of these terrorists, and the failure to provide at least a reasonable explanation as to why Bldg 7 collapsed.
There are sooo many questions. And very few answers. Too many unique coincidences
The odds of the US an UK both being attacked on the day of drills EXACTLY matching the actual attacks are enough to cause any reasonable person to question the official story. Way too close to zero for my comfort.
Until I saw Bush sitting in that classroom for an eternity after he was informed that America was under attack, and no Secret Service attempted to move him to a secure location, I completely accepted the media story.
When Bush came out early stating that any "conspiracy theory" that differed from the official story was treasonous, I became very suspicious.
When the 9/11 Commission published it's report ignoring the money trail, I knew there had been a cover-up.
The one thing that kept getting hammered in was the importance of tracking and confiscating any monies bound for terrorist organizations. This was so important that the government was tracking ALL financial and banking transactions for its citizenry, but was not important to the attack that had happened?
If you feel safer accepting Bush's story, then I am happy for you.
If you want to open your eyes and realize that someone has something to hide, simply read the report and pay attention to what is not said.
The key to the entire investigation is Secretary Minetta's testimony to the 9/11 commission. It was recorded and broadcast on CSPAN, but not included or mentioned in the final report.
Ask anyone in the military what circumstances would be involved in asking if an order still stood. The question would ONLY be asked if the order in question was in direct conflict with normal procedures, such as a stand down of the Pentagon self defense system, to allow the incoming weapon to hit it's target.
Bottom line is that there are many more questions about 9/11 than there are definitive answers.
As far as Bush-hatred, I do not believe he was cunning or smart enough to pull this off. He knew, as evidenced by his and his staff reactions in the classroom, but he was not orchestrating the event.
That was done by Dick Cheney in charge of NORAD.
The only time in the history of NORAD that a sitting President or Vice President had ever taken command, AND the first time in US history that our air defense system was so completely disabled that 4 planes flew for nearly two hours without detection, interception or destruction.
The moronic extreme is to accept the word of a man that has continuously lied and deceived the American Public.
9/11
Patriot Act
WMD
Imminent threat
Mobile labs
Rose petals
6 months
Collateral damage reduction
Democratic Iraq
Domestic surveillance
Mission Accomplished
Last throws of the insurgency
Iran Nuclear weapons program
2007-01-20 17:47:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jack C 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
lol I think the inside job is the funniset most unrealistc consipracy I have ever heard of. Because 1. I'm sure that while they were building the World trade centers, what back in the 60s or 70s? That they somehow purposly convinced everyone involved to make them weak so that years later the government could use it as an exuse to invade Iraq? ya right. 2. If it was an inside job, then it wouldn't be a consiracy it would be fact. Because of the millions of dollars that inside people would get paid to officially say that. lol it's like the dumb people that belive that we didn't really land on the moon. 3. There are a number of checks and balences in the American governmnet. Nobody would get away with that. Just look at the open problems with the democrats versus republicans over even less important issues? yes I'm sure this would remain under the wraps, really. 4. If the government paid Osama or other terroists to attrack us, then why wouldn't Osama tell the American people? What better oppertinity to turn the country he hates most against their own government? Only in Hollywood. But it's a creative conspiracy. just not a real one. I agree with what you said, especially about the kid wearing that shirt.
2016-05-24 03:49:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all Bush hatred is valid, as he's an idiot. Second of all, anyone with any knowledge of explosives and demolitions knows an aircraft hitting a 110 floor building near the 80th floor cannot take down a building designed to withstand earthquakes and other natural disasters. Not to mention the fact that the building fell in exactly the same way it would have had it been a planned demolition.
2007-01-20 16:49:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Matthew H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
True. But the majority of Americans, both liberal and conservative don't believe the conspiracy nonsense. It's the lunatic fringe.
2007-01-20 16:42:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The planes differently came into the outside of the buildings.
Only very few believed it could be done.
2007-01-20 16:46:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by rob u 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
A lot doesn't add up though an inside job is a bit out there.
2007-01-20 16:42:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by barfield4ny 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yea.. i have a friend that belives it was a conspiracy too.. n he blew up and started yelling at me when i started laughing at him and told him to stop smoking the reefer.
2007-01-20 16:48:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by zakattak 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
you should really get over worrying about that, if it was it was and theres nothing we can do about it.. if it wasn't, then it still sucks that it happened.
2007-01-20 16:47:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Fluffington Cuddlebutts 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah, and the point of asking this question is?
2007-01-20 16:42:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by kberto 3
·
2⤊
2⤋