2007-01-20 14:54:33 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She would be holding the poor in the US accountable for their own lives and choices.
I could live with that.
2007-01-20 15:24:11 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Will if you can tell me the standards of iraq in which you can not because bush has not set any an what has bush done for the poor an working of this country not a dam thing an as for as welfare stop the free give aways an at least bill clinton done some of that
2007-01-20 15:05:54 · answer #2 · answered by bigdogrex 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
After 9/11, we had to offer the president what he asked for. no count what. no count how reluctantly. It replaced right into a count of status mutually at an significant 2nd. 9/11 gave Bush the main suitable to ask for allot of skill. It replaced into granted. And he used it foolishly. that's truthfully the historic past of the pro-tension votes in a nutshell.
2016-12-16 09:32:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe she does. She endorses programs that help people transition OUT of the welfare state. The immediate cost to the taxpayer is offset by the number of people who will not spend several years or a lifetime living on the government dole. Likewise in Iraq, she supports providing the resources required for the Iraqi government to take the helm so that we do not end up spending years providing security and police services. Clinton promotes self-sufficiency, but realizes that tools must be provided for some to acheive it. You can give a man a fish every day of his life, or you can teach him how to fish.
2007-01-20 15:13:41 · answer #4 · answered by roknrolr63 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Keep whining about welfare. It costs 1/1000 the cost of the war in Iraq per year. I work with people who cannot work and require this assistance. Is necessary assiatance to Americans bad? Much better that we spend the money on fighting an enemy we cannoyt possibly defeat.
2007-01-20 14:59:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
You mean like arrange social programs, build hospitals, universal healthcare, etc.? Like we are giving Iraqis but do not give our own people (even though Iraq is 1000X poorer than we are)?
2007-01-20 15:00:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
She's still working on that National Health care plan.
2007-01-20 14:57:52 · answer #7 · answered by ValleyR 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iraq can't vote for her so if she makes THEM work - who care right!
2007-01-20 14:58:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary *coughcoughbitch* would bring the US down and ruin things for my generation.
2007-01-20 14:59:19 · answer #9 · answered by Cuddly Lez 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Try to be specific so we know what the heck you are talking about. Thanx
2007-01-20 15:01:28 · answer #10 · answered by John H 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋