My mom's mom mom's mom's mom was the Mary Queen of Scotts. For those who do not know, she was the first person to ever be killed by the guilletine. What percent of blue blood (royal blood) would that make me?
2007-01-20 14:50:55 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
I know i am missing a couple of people, but the line is still from her. She had 2 or 3 kids, that i think might have been banished and one was murdered.
2007-01-21 06:59:36 · update #1
first of all, I think when James of Scotland (relation of Elizabeth 1) became king of Scotland and England that may have kicked you out of succession. Just out of curiosity, are you Catholic???? I think you do have royal blood, but since Royalty has evolved down a different tree, I doubt you would have a royal title. But it never hurts to find out, see if there are any royal lineage trees on the web. Check out Ancestors.com and see if they can direct you to sites that trace royal dynasties. Elizabeth and Henry V111 were Tudors, which was a welsh family. I don't know if James was a Tudor, maybe he was a Stuart???well, how exciting, best of luck on your research
2007-01-20 15:03:11 · answer #1 · answered by magpie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1/10
2007-01-20 14:54:18 · answer #2 · answered by Jilli Bean 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, I don't think you'll be in line to the throne. James I (and VI) was Mary's only heir, and all of his heirs are pretty well accounted for. She miscarried twins belonging to the earl of Bothwell.
Since you aren't sure of the generations that have passed, it's difficult to say how much royal blood you have, but probably no more than anyone else.
2007-01-21 10:50:20 · answer #3 · answered by Sandy Lou 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
1/3
2007-01-20 14:52:52 · answer #4 · answered by glamour04111 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Mary Queen of Scots was not killed with the guillotine...she had her head chopped off with an axe....and she was killed in the 1580's so I think you are missing a relative or two. I would do some research and see if that is true or not....a lot of family stories end up not being 100% true. But check it out....you might be entitled to some ancestral lands!!! hahaha.
2007-01-20 16:57:26 · answer #5 · answered by mel9711 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It would depend on how many people are closer in relation to the throne than you. The percentage of your blood doesn't really matter as much as having some at all.
2007-01-20 15:51:48 · answer #6 · answered by red 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I beleive that makes you 1/32 Blue Blood. I do not think that makes you mentionable to the throne.
2007-01-20 14:55:59 · answer #7 · answered by captainty 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I Mary queen of scots was beheaded that means the line to the throne was directed down a different path. You're a nobody, Dufus.
2007-01-20 18:38:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
1/10.
2007-01-20 17:08:07 · answer #9 · answered by robert m 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
definite.Diana's divorce has no bearing on William's prestige as first born son of the Prince of Wales.William is Charles' inheritor,divorce having no effect.Diana,eventhough she wasn't going to be queen,replaced into looking forward to turning out to be the King mom,the mummy of a reigning king.
2016-10-31 21:18:42 · answer #10 · answered by canevazzi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋