English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Can you please be detailed when answering this question.

2007-01-20 13:53:06 · 3 answers · asked by Sublime 2 in Arts & Humanities History

3 answers

The Humanists, like Galileo, proposed that evidence from nature, not authoritative teachings from the church, should be the test of reality. The Humanist Desiderius Erasmus was much respected. Another Humanist, Roger Ascham, was chosen by Catherine Parr to be the educator of the children of Henry VIII, with the result that Queen Elizabeth 1 had the benefit of a Humanist education. When Elizabeth ascended the throne, England entered a golden age in which free thinking and new ideas were welcomed, not suppressed. Unlike Germany, where Martin Luther strongly condemned reason, Elizabeth's England encouraged the use of reason. These features of Humanism - respect for evidence and for the use of reason - opened the way for the scientific revolution of the succeeding centuries. Science flourished in England and in its offshoot, America, and the scientific revolution hasn't slowed down since. Our modern world is a product of Humanism.

2007-01-21 13:06:26 · answer #1 · answered by fra59e 4 · 1 0

Humanists do not believe in diety-based answers to any question therefore a physical answer must exist. I do not know of the scientific revolution you suggest but Humanism is very logic-based and this would definitely have an impact on how answers are sought to any unknown situation.


fra59e definitely has the authorative answer. Kudos.

2007-01-20 14:02:30 · answer #2 · answered by ©2009 7 · 0 0

As first guy mentioned, Protestant Reformation promoted the thought that the Catholic Church wasn't infallible, and probably wasn't even mandatory for reigiously minded people to get to heaven while they died. The scientific Revolution performed a function by way of fact it presented the 1st concrete evidence that Church notions of ways the universe replaced into built might desire to truly be shown to be incorrect approximately issues interior the non-religious international. Church had claimed that universe replaced into geocentric and that planets have been completely soft crystal spheres. Galileo used a telescope to coach that the planets had bumpy blemished surfaces, exhibiting in an on the spot that the Church replaced into no longer infallible. Church doctrine additionally held that larger, heavier gadgets fall swifter than smaller, lighter ones, yet Galileo somewhat confirmed that they the two hit the floor on the comparable time if dropped from an incredible top. Galileo moved right remote from concrete demonstrations of small issues to claiming that the Church have been incorrect all alongside that the Earth replaced into the middle of the image voltaic gadget, which replaced into huge. by way of fact Galileo replaced into very confrontational approximately it, the Church used its political skill to tension him to recant. yet this plan backfired as further and further evidence amassed exhibiting that he have been outstanding. Galileo is only the main widespread occasion. The concept of a sunlight-based image voltaic gadget had first been placed forth via Copernicus approximately one hundred years earlier, in a miles less confrontational way. and of direction Kepler and Newton persevered to pursue Galileo's recommendations of ways the universe labored.

2016-12-16 09:30:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers