2007-01-20 13:47:45 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No - they'll blame the stupidity of Americans - that's their favorite scapegoat.
2007-01-20 14:36:04 · answer #1 · answered by Jadis 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How can Democrats blame Nader? He purely gets a million% of the vote each and every time he runs. that's genuine that elections are approximately decision, especially situations I accept as true with Republcans and especially situations I accept as true with Democrats. no you are able to truly blame everyone for the effect of an election, however there is controversy at situations, like the entire Florida subject interior the 2000 election. applicants won't be able to truly take votes, it extremely is approximately decision. purely thank you to take votes is merely too rig the ballots.
2016-11-25 23:07:36 · answer #2 · answered by lansford 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am hoping that Ron Paul runs for president in 2008. It will be the first time I actually vote Republican, but it would be well worth the switch. We need to start looking at the actual politicians and what they stand for and not the party. To answer your question, whichever party loses the election, there will always be speculation as to why they did. Blame is a result of the shame of defeat. Voting needs to be honest this time around and that will resolve a lot of the blame game.
2007-01-20 14:25:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, they'll have to blame someone. That's what Democrats do. What did Republicans say when we lost in November? "We lost". What would Democrats have said if the shoe had been on the other foot? "Diebold stole it", "Bush figured out a way to steal another election", "The Republicans paid gnomes and leprechauns to sabotage the election", anything except, "We lost". When they win, it's the will of the people. When they lose, somebody or something must have happened to thwart the will of the people. They're just paranoid weasels.
2007-01-20 13:53:05 · answer #4 · answered by Rick N 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
To the moron thinking that since G.W. has ruined the Republican vote, that's just laughable. At present the best the Dumbocrats can do is an unproven Senator with a shaky record (Obama) or some frosted old woman who no one likes anyhow (Clinton). They will both have major obstacles to overcome purely in demographics, not even along party lines and you think that Republicans will have a tough time getting votes? Wow.
2007-01-20 14:13:29 · answer #5 · answered by Modus Operandi 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I can see it now. They're going to lose, because Hillary, since announcing her bid now looks like a deer in the head lights. Anyway, they're going to lose, and claim with all their might that the election was stolen, and try with all their might to sue their way into office. It's the Liberal way.
2007-01-20 13:57:13 · answer #6 · answered by mojojo66 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They only have themselves to blame and the failure to work at registering voters and involving people in the future .
If they would promise to ease the tax burden cut spending on wasted programs till we get our ducks in order then they would get the support of the people .
2007-01-20 13:54:16 · answer #7 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Chvyno1:
That's what Kerry said.
Funny, he didn't even HAVE a plan. He was just there to be "the guy to vote for in case you hate Bush".
Wow, what a leadership quality. I can't believe that more people didn't vote for him.
/no, not really.
//Kerry is an idiot
2007-01-20 13:58:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, I think they'll accuse the Republicans of stealing the election again. It's worked for them well.
2007-01-20 13:51:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
There has to be somebody for them to blame! If not Nader they can blame Diebold!
2007-01-20 13:50:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋