2007-01-20 13:31:34 · 33 answers · asked by kathi_williams_70 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
he definatly didnt do it after all he was found not guilty in a court of law so he needs to be left alone.
2007-01-20 13:36:40 · answer #1 · answered by kevin m 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes, of course he did. But this was made into a racial issue by black lawyer Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. who made up a story about Mark Fermin from the LAPD being racist for planting the bloody glove and this got OJ off.
It was purely a race issue and made a mockery of the US court system by letting a killer off.
There was a second civil trail and OJ lost and owes 33.5 million to the Goldmans and Nicole Simpson's estate.
2007-01-20 13:35:24 · answer #2 · answered by charles 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Everyone has pointed the finger at him. I don't think he did it, but he knows who did. His alibi was too convenient. That waiter was more to Nicole than the man who brought her glasses home. Think about it.
2007-01-20 13:58:29 · answer #3 · answered by robee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I believe he did. One of his lawyers Robert "Bob" Kardashian said he had doubts about O.J.'s innoncence and even many of the jurors believed he did it. O.J. can lie to his kids and to the world and even to himself but he can't hide the truth from God!
2007-01-20 13:41:48 · answer #4 · answered by Amber 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is Paris Hilton a skank whore? Is Nicole Richie a skinny slut? Is Lindsay Lohan good enough to eat.? I think you know the answer to these questions.
2007-01-20 13:42:04 · answer #5 · answered by rick r 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
and just becuz someone divorced free and single wants a waiter
was her business
noone deserves death
Her head was 2 inches from being completely sliced off
He is an animal
2007-01-20 14:08:19 · answer #6 · answered by dreamy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course, have you ever scene the crime scene photos? ihope that asshole rots in hell
go to yahoo and put in simpson murder and they will pop up if ya want to se them, there was more evidence against him than scott peterson but I guess oj's jury didnt want to be responsible for the city being burnt to the ground
2007-01-20 13:36:22 · answer #7 · answered by BoTToms UP 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but celebs in California are exempt from felony convictions.
2007-01-20 17:19:40 · answer #8 · answered by DawnDavenport 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a mountain of evidence to say he did an no evidence to prove otherwise. He is practically bragging about it in his new book that he's about to publish. He's guilty as hell.
2007-01-20 13:40:13 · answer #9 · answered by dmc81076 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-01-20 13:36:22 · answer #10 · answered by ra63 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not having been a witness to the act I really couldnt say
2007-01-20 13:36:22 · answer #11 · answered by witchfromoz2003 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋