2007-01-20 13:15:06 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Gender has nothing to do with it-- they'd vote for a dog before they'd vote for a conservative.
I will say that the fact that Senator Clinton is a female will gain the votes of many women who are too stupid to figure out what she actually believes in.
2007-01-20 14:07:14 · answer #1 · answered by i'm @ vertigo 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm not so much concerned about that as I am about how many moderates and , yes, republican voters do so. I don't mind the idea, or actuality of a woman leader, Margret Thatcher, Indira ghandi, Golda Mier (sp) are all fine examples of women in high leadership positions. Hillary, however, has set a decidedly left wing agenda as her goal. While she has made efforts to bring herself into the mainstream, and I do admire a comment that says, and I paraphrase "I don't get to redo my life, I stand by my vote, even if with hindsight I would have done differently".(and in truth, she did not go that far as to recant). She is as much an opportunist as her husband (if the relationship even means or meant anything) and her agenda, even if it is well meaning (as opposed to historically self serving), is harmfull to America. I will not say I will move to Canada, or the UK. I sure as hell won't move to France. Given my current health problems, if Hillary gets elected to President, I can only hope I am dead. I can only imagine in this opverly sensitive PC world, any opposition to Hillary as President would be met with immediate "sexist" label, no matter how valid the arguement. Hillary IS a smart woman, and ambitious, I don't take that away from her. She is however, less concerned about the law, and what is proper (regardless of left or right), than she is about her own future and her mark on history. I would not go out of my way to vote against her. I would hope that American citizens know better that to vote for her in the first place. Then again, the Dems tried to sell us on John Kerry. I wish my state would wake up and see he is nothing but a gigilo in an empty suit. I am the least of John Kerry supporters, knowing how little he has done one way or the otheras a Senator from Massachusetts. Unfortunately, it is not hard to keep a seat as a Dem from Mass. That said, I would sooner vote for John Kerry for President rather than Hillary Clinton. Kerry would vote by polls alone and while leadership would be lacking, damage would be minimal. Damage that Hillary might be able to impose might be harder to shake off
2007-01-20 13:47:08 · answer #2 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you think the blacks have felt they were held down, that's nothing compared to women. A lot of women would vote for the devil, if she wore a bra! This is no laughing matter, genitalia, not brains will be Hillary's slogan, and the femi-nazi's will soak it up, hook, line, and sucker!
Granted, there are many straight thinking women who will vote the candidate, some will vote the party, many will deliberately not vote for Hillary. These are the people I would like to stand in line with, come election day! Some men too, will vote for Hillary! I can think of five for sure, well calling them men may be a bit optimistic.
2007-01-20 13:28:40 · answer #3 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you will be able to desire to locate the money for to pay slightly greater interest to the truthfully numbers in this one. the rustic isn't just about as divided as you think of. Hillary have been given greater of the female vote than Obama yet basically slightly. And Obama is doing o.k. with white male voters. on the different area there's a particularly descent flow amoung the religious fundamentalists to coach to the left. issues are turning around. we've the traditionally religious outstanding going liberal. on the different hand, we've the 1st technology of wealthy black people initiating to look in the direction of the conservative area of issues and the black vote has constantly long gone to the left. do no longer provide up on usa only yet.
2016-12-16 09:28:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think lots of gays will vote for her, because I honestly think she's lesbian. Liberal men are wussies, so they won't have a problem voting for her. Femi-Nazi women that would rather let a day care raise their kids will vote for her, and also, because Hillary is for the murder of innocent, unborn children. What Hillary is going to have a problem with is Bill's past, her vote for the war, and slues of other problems. It's fixing to get really nasty. I mean, this is the Clinton's we're talking about, and political investigations are brutal. I can't wait!
2007-01-20 13:30:34 · answer #5 · answered by mojojo66 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Don't have a percentage,but my guess on the people that will vote for her would be a large majority of young female voters.Just because it would be "cool" to have a woman president.
2007-01-20 15:58:10 · answer #6 · answered by mizzjerry 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will NOT vote for Hillary. Her gender is irrelevant.
2007-01-21 07:44:48 · answer #7 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't vote for her if she was both genders, at the same time. Nothing to do with gender.
2007-01-20 13:19:59 · answer #8 · answered by flip4449 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Only the foolish ones. Maybe 50% of the registered Democrat females.
2007-01-20 13:18:43 · answer #9 · answered by jeffpsd 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Maybe 15 percent.
2007-01-20 13:23:17 · answer #10 · answered by Dane 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋