Simple. A cream pie was thrown at his face. That's how he could know.
2007-01-20 12:50:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd really like more details, but I'll hazard a guess, ok? In most cases this refers to sudden death, either of a violent external-accident or homicide-or violent internal-aneurysm, stroke-nature. In all of these cases, if the time from injury to death or unconsciousness is slight, even if they are aware of the impact or of some sense of wrongness-a flash of light, or nausea for example-in the case of an internal event, there isn't time for the awareness to be of more import than any other curious event that the person does not have enough information about to understand their nature. They might know their car has spun out of control, they might have heard a loud noise, seen a flash of light or felt a little strange-even if they had time to perceive that much, there wasn't enough time for the line of thought to be followed to a logical end. You know the situation better than I do. Know also that for a person to perceive themselves as suffering their sense of self must be intact, which is a higher brain function. Any injury serious enough to cause unconsciousness or even shock would negate any meaningful sense of suffering. Does this help?
2007-01-20 13:11:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by caitkynthei 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your man told me I was good in bed. I like food. Do you like food? Maybe that spaghetti we ate last night hit him in his woo..... Yeah... I love food.... and my MARINE!!!
2007-01-20 14:45:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by →sugarwuss 3
·
0⤊
1⤋