English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

-- In defense of Bushco's fraudulent and failed war?

2007-01-20 11:36:19 · 12 answers · asked by Typical McCain Supporter 2 in Politics & Government Government

12 answers

It is so sad that these young people don't even have a chance to see what life is all about, it breaks my heart everytime I turn on the news. When is it going to stop, Bush does not care about any of these men & women giving it their all, I have nothing good to say about this man, nor do I take up for him.

2007-01-20 11:47:17 · answer #1 · answered by beautie 4 · 1 3

Hello,

If I were a neocon, which I used to be before 9/11 (then I found out in 2003 what our government really did), I would have said, I feel sorry for these soliders families.

Well, I still feel sorry for these families. This was just a very stupid way to die in a war created by our secret societies to make us submit to their new laws, for "protection". And, to form a North American Union with Superhighways already being built.

Hope this helps you............... : -O

2007-01-21 02:37:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No one won anything but Bush and his company oil friends, this lives waisted just for the greedy companies, and still there are some US citizens believing its for a fair cause, remember Vietnam_
Short memory.
I feel sorry for the death of this soldiers and for the death of all the Innocent civilians in Iraq murdered

2007-01-20 20:03:49 · answer #3 · answered by monis 2 · 0 1

It isn't Bush's war. It is our war. And if you have never been backed into a corner where nobody respects you and have had to fight your way out, even if you lose you have gained the respect of the others. We backed up and continued to back up and if we backed up when they turned those two towers into a great big liquefier we would have lost more respect for ourselves than we have in this war.

2007-01-20 19:54:09 · answer #4 · answered by JORGE N 7 · 1 1

Nobody cares anyway. Don't you see? It's all about winning or loosing. Bush and his Reps keep on going till is no more money left in the National bank.

2007-01-20 19:57:42 · answer #5 · answered by flyoverall 2 · 1 1

Uh, war is hell and twenty deaths is twenty too many, although that many probably have passed away in this country in the time it took to punch these here keys.

2007-01-20 19:48:07 · answer #6 · answered by done wrenching 7 · 3 0

really...where is the link to the article...i guess they would say your are lying through your rotten teeth...and the war is NOT fraudulent...and you only wish it will fail...you may not like bush or his policies...but you should at least want victory for america...if not...get out of america...you are not needed or wanted...

2007-01-20 19:50:54 · answer #7 · answered by turntable 6 · 2 1

3 thousand lives sacrificed to save our democracy is drastically less than the amount of lives sacrificed in WWII. Freedom is worth dying for, sorry you don't understand.

2007-01-20 19:47:29 · answer #8 · answered by asafam23 3 · 3 2

Yes I would like to thank them and their family for their sacrifice. Something you would never understand!

2007-01-20 19:58:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Helo crash and it is a war, stop being so stupid about it. We lost more men in 36 days at Iwo Jima than we have in this whole war. Maybe we should dig up FDR and pummel him over that.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons
of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President
Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.We want to
seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." -
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Iraq is a long way from here, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the
risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons
against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb
18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." -
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution
and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on
suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens.
Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9,1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction
technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and
palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs.
Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may
be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery
systems and is doubtless using the cover of an illicit missile program to develop
longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to
President Bus h, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the
peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter
and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore,
Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen.
Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop
nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We
also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in
development of weapons of mass destruction."- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10,
2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant
UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological
weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D,
CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein
has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery
capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked,
Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical
warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D,
NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein
has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and
storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-if
necessary-to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons
of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F.
Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous
dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat
because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating
America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real"
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

2007-01-20 19:49:18 · answer #10 · answered by zombiefighter1988 3 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers