No , He or the Republicans will never admit they are wrong.
They just blame Clinton- LOL
2007-01-20 11:10:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by roeroe47me 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Lila..
Here's a lesson for you in reality.. hope it doesn't jolt you out of your comfy chair..
BUT.. Bush will NEVER be sorry.. because he knew all along what he was doing.. he knew all along it was wrong.. he knew all along he was going to need to commit mass murder.. he knew all along he would cause massive damage ot a sovereign nation.. how did he know??
Well.. it was all part of the plan all along!!
The sad part of the Iraq War is that through Bush.. we finally saw that murder is a part of acceptable behavior.. under the Westminster System of law! Bush used the legal system to defend and execute his war.. THUS the legal system is to be blamed first and foremost.. Bush should eventually be given a medal for at least being himself and showing the true colors that have lead to so many wars and dodgy invasions on small powerless sovereign nations by past leaders under this Westminster legal system..
EITHER THAT.. or the Westminster System will have to legally find that Bush is guilty as a leader of not only mass murder.. but war crimes beyond any acceptable level.. and he far outstrips any of his predecessors and is up there with Milosevic and Hitler..
If it is however all swept under the carpet of lies.. then.. more than likely.. global tensions will remain very high.. terrorism will become a normal part of modern life.. and we'll all go to hell in a handbasket when WW3 does eventually break out..
Hopefully USA and UK can use their powerful position now.. to find a suitable resolution in Palestine and Iraq.. thne work on a model for the future that does not include coercing, assasinating leaders and starting wars purely for the purpose of gaining valuable resources..
Hope that helps Lila
2007-01-20 11:17:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What a lame statement on your part.
You think that you are so right and he is so wrong that if he doesn't admit you are right then he is guilty of arrogance.
Ridiculous. He is, in fact, not wrong. And since you obviously disagree couldn't you at least admit that there is another side to the issue other than your that is perfectly legitimate? But I don't think you think like that. Unfortunately, that sounds a bit like arrogance on YOUR part.
If the Democrats take over and they force withdrawl from Iraq and as a result, terrorism increases worldwide, would you admit that YOU were wrong? Probably not. You'd probably just blame Bush.
2007-01-21 03:28:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by BMCR 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your question starts with your opinon that th u . s . a . grow to be incorrect. a million-- 2 weeks in the past the gov. released the information concerning to the WMD that have been stumbled on over 500 shells with Sarin and mustard gasoline. it would desire to no longer have been pronounced on MTV however the information is on the industry in case you look. 2--Sadam killed a pair hundred?? a pair hundred in keeping with day is extra like it. The mass grave our troops have uncovered have 10's of thousand of adult males females and teenagers in them. 3-- As for no ties with al-queda lower back they have evidence that Iraq secret police did have conferences with contributors of al-queda and extra evidence that Sadam grow to be helping them finacialy. 4-- incorrect is erroneous there is not any thank you to spin killing , torture, rape as a various fee gadget.
2016-10-07 11:31:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by riesgo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The worst kind of fanatic regardless of which side they are on is a religious fanatic and that is what George Bush is.They are the ones for whom God is on their side and therefore cannot be wrong, just like I am sure Osama bin Laden does. George Bush told us in one of his pep talks that god had told him to carry out this war. Well if there is a God then George Bush is in deep s""t.
2007-01-20 11:07:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by amigo 2
·
7⤊
0⤋
We can discuss the humility of these men after they have attacked Iran as the final part of their plan for Dominion in the Gulf Oil Region. Their Hubris is on steroids, and they only laugh at us on the way to the Bank of Dubai.
2007-01-20 11:03:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by michaelsan 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
No, as he said, all he has to do is hang on another few months.
He will be voted out and it will be someone elses problem to end it. If it ends badly he can step back and say I tried but everyone was against me. Wether they are against him or not he is leaving the legacy for someone else he doesn't want it said he didn't finish the job like his father didn't in Iraq.
2007-01-20 11:02:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Steven 6
·
7⤊
1⤋
Never ever. He is still trying to sell that Irak has massive destruction weapons ... what are we talking about?
On the other hand he is not clever enough to realize that he is mistaken because he is making himself and his friends and family earn lots of money ..
2007-01-20 11:18:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Coquine 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Are you nuts? Be glad he admitted he was responsible for some mistakes or missteps or whatever the hell he said in his last speech.
2007-01-20 11:06:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He wasn't wrong to help get Hussein out of power, but he was wrong to allow a simple military action to be completely buggered by a bunch of liberals.
So if the US doesn't kill terrorists, you expect us to believe that they will put their bombs away an be nice? (sigh)
Its the Saudis who are paying families for the use of family members as suicide bombers. Thats the incentive. That an 72 virgins in the afterlife. (will they be married to them, or comit adultery out of wed-lock?)
If you dislike the policies of your nation so badly, then by all means pack your bags and move to Iran. The US hasn't tainted the Muslim utopia there yet. Enjoy.
2007-01-20 11:13:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by vaughndhume 3
·
2⤊
4⤋