I dont see anything wrong with a woman being president. She would have to be intelligent, ethical, honest and diplomatic, this disqualifies Hillary
2007-01-20 10:55:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gary S 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
At this point it really doesn't matter any more. Man, woman, wombat, whatever gets elected will be tainted by the PACs and special interests, and even if it isn't, the Congress it will have to work with will be.
BTW, I have to laugh at all the women who moan about sexism and male chauvinists keeping a woman out of the White House. Last I knew, women outnumbered the men in this country, especially women over the age of 18. You got the vote in 1920, ladies, if anyone is holding up the first woman president its those of your own gender.
2007-01-20 11:34:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by normanbormann 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing wrong. There's nothing different if a woman gets voted into office--same as if a guy did it. The only thing wrong with it is...I definitely do NOT want just anybody being sworn in just she's a woman, or he's black, or he's Muslim, or she's black and Muslim.
Should be about the campaign and agenda, not the race.
But I assume you're talking about Hilary.
So no. Not Hilary.
2007-01-20 10:47:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Picard Facepalm 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
The conflict in Iraq became long over due and by using all rights must be taken to each Mid-East u . s . and a million/2 of the U.N.. The economic equipment isn't undesirable and on an identical time as we've run up the deficit we stayed afloat with an assault, a huge typhoon and conflict on 2 fronts. I blame congress the two republican and democrat for the incessant pandering and non-persist with by using on immigration reform and out of control spending. As to the criminal equipment ,,, properly that's a capitalistic u . s . and the voters set the cultural recognition of issues in spite of in the event that they seem to be a criminal offense. We call for our drugs and we call for that they be stopped. sort of places the criminal equipment interior the middle and that i will assure you that there is income to be made and each city, county and state needs sales. The fault for all starts suitable here. seem interior the mirror and repeat the words. Act on that and bypass it on and who's acquainted with? the matters could get fixed.
2016-12-12 16:16:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, women have been ruling as queens of countries for centuries. And doing a darn good job of it too. It seems that our nation cannot understand that. A female president would be great.
2007-01-20 10:48:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tumbleweed 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nothing wrong with a woman, but much wrong with an opportunistic hypocrite like Hillary.
2007-01-20 10:41:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Western civilization is a complete and total failure, and Krishna consciousness is the only solution.
Human life is a combination of matter and spirit soul, and the whole process of Vedic knowledge is directed at liberating the spirit soul from the contamination of matter. Those men who are too materialistic are unaware of this knowledge and are more inclined to economic development for material enjoyment. The human life is not meant for hard labor for economic development, nor is it meant for sex indulgence like that of the dogs and hogs. It is specially meant for making a solution to the problems of material life and the miseries thereof. So the people waste their valuable human life by sleeping and sex indulgence at night, and by laboring hard in the daytime to accumulate wealth, and after doing so, they try to improve the standard of materialistic life. In this way, they waste their whole life, not understanding the purpose of human life, and die just like cats and dogs, completely unaware of the spiritual reality.
If you want to know more, email me at The_Holy_Name@yahoo.com
2007-01-20 10:49:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Emily Meyes 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
Naw, I doubt she could do worse than any of the men have done...just hope whoever gets the job can handle it and is worthy of it (that hasn't happened in decades).
2007-01-20 10:45:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by . 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton is a woman?
2007-01-20 10:45:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
It depends on the woman.
2007-01-20 10:41:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by booboo 7
·
2⤊
0⤋