2007-01-20 10:10:25 · 13 answers · asked by True Grit 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That is the same rational of attacking Iraq because of 9/11 for the few who may have missed my point.
2007-01-20 10:19:09 · update #1
Don't leave North Dakota out of the equation. It's possible that they were a threat too.
2007-01-20 10:18:19 · answer #1 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Argentina and Chile
Prescott Bush didn't like Peron & Pinochet
Go big Red Go
2007-01-20 18:15:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
no my friend if you wish to look at sides it would be the liberals screaming about us getting involved with germany as they did not attack us at perl harbor, so by attacking the germans were going to go into a war we cannot win.
2007-01-20 18:22:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hmmm. If the left of today were around back then,we might be speaking Japanese.
2007-01-20 18:29:29 · answer #4 · answered by tabs 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course not. China doesn't have any oil. But we do know he would have read My Pet Goat for 7 minutes.
2007-01-20 18:18:45 · answer #5 · answered by Duffman 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
it doesnt madda homies get war off your mine what it is so good for aabsolutely nothin lol sorry i jus needed a laugh
2007-01-20 18:15:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, but I'm sure Clinton would be selling SECRETS to China if he were President then
2007-01-20 18:14:38 · answer #7 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
highly unlikely
2007-01-20 18:13:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
hmmm... no, we would have already been in the war against Germany and japan
2007-01-20 18:13:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Being it was in Hawaii, he might have bombed NYC, you never know,
2007-01-20 18:14:54 · answer #10 · answered by P.A.M. 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋