neither one.
2007-01-20 08:57:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by aaaaaaaaaaaaa 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
Below is an e-mail I received, I will certainly check it out before I give him any votes.
I have always been taught:
All that glitters is not gold.
If it sounds too good to be true, then it must be.
Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see.
Just because he is good looking, doesn't mean his has a lick of sense or is qualified to lead our country.
Speaking bluntly, in a real presidential election, no one in their right mind would vote for Obama. That would be like voting for the guy who just moved in down the street from you, that you wave to from time to time but don't know a thing about. That's Obama. He's been a US Senator for about 100 days, give or take a week. Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim while admitting that he was once a Muslim, mitigating that damning information by saying that, for two years, he also attended a Catholic school. Obama's father, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was a radical Muslim who migrated from Kenya to Jakarta, Indonesia. He met Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, a white atheist from Wichita, Kansas at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Obama, Sr. and Dunham divorced when Barack, Jr. was two. Obama's spinmeisters are now attempting to make it appear that Obama's introduction to Islam came from his father and that influence was temporary at best. In reality, the senior Obama returned to Kenya immediately following the divorce and never again had any direct influence over his son's education. Dunham married another Muslim, Lolo Soetoro who educated his stepson as a good Muslim by enrolling him in one of Jakarta's Wahabbi schools. Wahabbism is the radical teaching that created the Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad on the industrialized world. Since it is politically expedient to be a Christian when you are seeking political office in the United States, Obama joined the United Church of Christ to help purge any notion that he is still a Muslim, which, ideologically, he remains today
2007-01-20 22:52:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by LucySD 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Hillary, of course!!
She has 8 years experience already, remember?
And there is no denying her level of intelligence.
2007-01-21 03:22:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by BigTip$ 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary....she's had the experience and with the mess this country is in now I think we really need that.
2007-01-21 16:01:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by evilmunkees 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Obama by default. I already know what Clinton is and anything would be better than her. If that were the only two choices I might decide to become a beach bum in Jamaica though.
2007-01-20 16:59:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Barack Obama cuz I like him better. Honestly, I think he has the American people at heart and Hillary just wants to advance her own, already made agenda.
2007-01-20 16:58:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by trueblue88 5
·
1⤊
5⤋
Senator Clinton. She already ran the White House when her husband was there.
2007-01-20 19:47:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by A W 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Obama.
We need someone NEW and DIFFERANT than everyone who's been in office in the past. He's an extremely educated man with a lot of good ideas
2007-01-20 19:08:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by az_showers 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Obama. We need a fresh perspective in the white house.
2007-01-20 19:31:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by rosie girl 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
It would be Obama because i do not want to have Hillary
2007-01-20 17:00:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by moose master 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
neither but if i had to pick it would be Hillary!
2007-01-22 14:09:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by lou 7
·
0⤊
0⤋