I just don’t understand the mentality that accepts such movies as “An Inconvenient Truth”, ”The Day After Tomorrow”, “Fahrenheit 911”, or their favorite “The Eternal Jew” as fact. Surely they know these are works of fiction?
Are their handlers able to work them up so much with hate that they accept these obvious absurdities as true?
2007-01-20 08:15:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Your question is as intellectually dishonest as the people from the left saying neocons are into the TV show 24 because it keeps domestic terrorism in the consciousness of the mainstream. At the rate that true liberals lead with their chin, you're going to have to do better than this to bring swing voters like me to your next election party.
2007-01-20 08:28:02 · answer #1 · answered by Goofy Foot 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You left out "Loose Change," the "documentary" that started out as fiction, morphed into a "documentary" on the second edition after its release on a Fox affiliate TV station in NY - and has since been cut, re-edited and re-cut numerous times with a "final" edition coming out this month or next.
I personally don't think this is the way "documentaries" are produced - cutting and slashing all of the debunked initial "facts" and conclusions, misquotes and out of context material and replacing them with unreliable sources, oversimplified arguments and cherry picked evidence.
Try and tell converts that it's simply not gospel - and you'll be labeled as naive, ignorant or just plain brain washed. Go figure.
2007-01-20 16:37:58 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
An Inconvenient Truth is a documentary sharing scientific findings. You must be a genius.
Go eat Mc Donald's..then sue for having a heart attack.
2007-01-20 16:27:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Obviously you do not know the difference between a documentary and a movie. As far as the stock placed in them that is up to each individuals interpretation. What I would like to know is how you know what "neo-libs" think? Also, what exactly is a neo lib, something made up here on Yahoo??
2007-01-20 16:20:51 · answer #4 · answered by Frank R 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, look at the movie The Passion of the Christ. That is an excellent movie (direction, acting, etc.), but did it get it's proper "props" come Oscar night? NO. Why? Does Hollywood have that many Jewish people in it? Seriously, not to offend anyone, but some of the movies who get picked as "best" truly suck. Anyone remember the movie The Piano? That SUCKED to high heaven! I am just wondering what Hollywood is thinking as well.
And, although there is some proof that global warming is harming our planet, has anyone forgotten what happened to the weather during the middle ages? That lasted between 1100 and 1450 or so and was COLD, COLD, COLD. Does anyone not think that this strange weather is happening because it naturally must?
2007-01-20 16:23:17 · answer #5 · answered by madjennyvane 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋
While these may be works of fiction, they are commonly billed as documenteries, which are not works of fiction. In fact, some of these movies do contain some "fact" but it is so twisted, taken out of context, and distorted that it ceases to be truth and becomes propaganda.
2007-01-20 16:22:49 · answer #6 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
go to this site which if full of PHD,S and military professionals..see what they have to say...as for movies I don't need them...except for the full videos that the FBI confiscated from three different locations, showing what hit the Pentagon and still will not let the world see.
2007-01-20 16:21:13 · answer #7 · answered by dstr 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No, They can't tell illusion from reality. And yes, they all should have handlers so they can't hurt or influence anyone else.
2007-01-20 16:22:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Well, liberals' campaigns are based on works of fiction, so it fits.
2007-01-20 16:17:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋
Brain dead libs think that these movies are fact
2007-01-20 16:17:58 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 3⤊ 6⤋