Do elections matter?

Question

What happened? First, in a classic example of ruling-class overreach, Bush tried to parlay his relatively narrow victory over Kerry into highly unpopular initiatives--like the attempt to privatize Social Security. Second, the unexpected eruption of major events, like Hurricane Katrina and the mass immigrant rights movement, put Bush and the right wing on the defensive.

And throughout it all was the growing realization among broad reaches of the American population of the increasing disaster in Iraq. In fact, Bush’s popularity dropped below 50 percent for good in August 2005--when Cindy Sheehan’s vigil outside Bush’s ranch galvanized antiwar sentiment.

All of these factors provide an illustration of what socialists mean when they describe bourgeois elections as the “lowest form of politics.” Bourgeois elections tend to reduce conflicting public attitudes to a simple choice of Party A or B. And they actively prevent the electorate from considering other options.

John16 - I would move to Cuba but since the US law prohibits me from travelling there that might be tough. SO much for freedumb huh dummy?

I guess I'll just stay here where we harbor terrorists in Miami to attack, poison, corrupt and attempt to overthrow the Government of Cuba.

enjoy your freedumb.

Answer 1

YES!!! It is your God-given right, and says so in the Consitution.

Better than tyranny.

Answer 2

In general election does matter but it depends on the system.
If in a democracy a very talented capable person can't run for an office without the support of groups with a lot of money and a lot of agenda, then the election process is doomed and the people are just pawns in the process.
If in a democracy, the elected people are hijacked by strong lobbies with a lot of Money and a lot of agendas, either by bribing, black-mail, future election considerations etc etc, then the election process is doomed and the people are just pawns in the process.
Both election process and lobbying process need basic overhaul so that the people get their power back from the unscrupulous lobbies.

Answer 3

no longer that a lot. Democrats will administration both properties of Congress, yet they do no longer have adequate of a majority interior the Senate to offer up a Republican filibuster. yet in spite of who the president is, warfare funding will wind down, because a presidential veto or a Republican filibuster of a Democratic warfare funding bill potential no funding in any respect. And taxes on the wealthy will pass up, because a veto or a filibuster of a Democratic tax bill basically potential the Bush tax cuts expire and anybody's taxes pass up. Healthcare received't replace because Democrats don't have the votes to get it by potential of the Senate. Democrats interior the Senate received't approve any McCain judicial appointees who might want to overturn Roe. So, you're top. Election do not mean a lot. no longer because Obama and McCain are so alike, yet because the structure doesn't supply that a lot potential to the president.

Answer 4

Well son. We like elections just fine. Move to Cuba if you are so unhappy with the way we decide public policy here.

Lowest form of politics indeed!

Answer 5

If elections didn't matter, no one would vote, no one would run for office, no one would even have a political opinion. And after 230 some years, if they didn't matter, we wouldn't have them anymore.
That fact that power is transferred after most elections makes them worthwhile.

Answer 6

Sure elections matter. Just ask John Kerry.

Answer 7

too much drivel to read, so I'll just answer the question....


No. It doesn't really matter. Hello...look who got the presidency AGAIN after a clear polling of people who voted democrat!

Answer 8

Where are you copy/pasting this from?