It is clear Bush and Kerry belonged to the infamous Skull and Bones society. A society so secret they are bound to silence on the subject. Even in the bible it says man cannot have 2 masters for he will love the one and hate the other. So why are these type of politicians even allowed to be in the nomination of a public servant position when their loyalties are already established by secret society affiliation?
2007-01-20 07:19:33 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I hate to say it but most of your answers are frightening to say the least. I also realize many of you do not understand the power given to a secret society when the top leaders of the land are in its membership.
2007-01-20 07:26:57 · update #1
The term american sheeple instead of american people seems truly fitting.
2007-01-20 07:28:21 · update #2
I agree I think it is totally unacceptable and inappropriate.
jw
2007-01-20 07:23:13 · answer #1 · answered by Janet lw 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Welcome to the club. All Presidents but one are Masons. All Chief Justices are Masons. Many belong to other more sinister groups with very secret agendas. That Kerry and Bush would not answer questions about this should have disqualified them both, but so far, the public is completely ignorant of the fact that we are being handled like farm animals by some very powerful groups. Most still believe we are in Iraq to set them free! La La La!
2007-01-20 07:51:32 · answer #2 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Skull and Bones and the Masonic Lodge are light years apart. My father was a high master of the Shriners and he was a wonderful man. The Masons, like our founding fathers, have done some wonderful things. Their secret has something to do with the Holy Grail and Mary Magdaline, not skulls and bones.
2007-01-26 13:01:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is a bad Idea ,and should stop.If you take the oath of office, you should renounce all other oaths.You can not serve two masters.Why only masons and skull and bones in high office? there is something fundamentally wrong with this.sinister maybe,We know what a communist is what do we know about these other groups?Is it wise to have a small group that seem to control everything,if our freedoms are at stake? no
2007-01-28 03:17:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not all that different from George Washington belonging to the Freemasons and wearing a Masonic apron for his inauguration, and then putting the "all seeing eye" of the Illuminati over a pyramid on our money. And putting (in Latin) "awaiting the New World Order" under it.
2007-01-20 07:23:57 · answer #5 · answered by barefoot_always 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very good question. Its been happening for years. Quite a few Masons wrote the Declaration of Independence. George Washington, Jefferson just to name a few. Keep your eyes on Mitt Romney on the republican ticket. He also is a mason. Wouldn't we all like to know just what their agenda is!
2007-01-20 07:29:08 · answer #6 · answered by wmf936 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Skull & Bones affects different people in different.
Bush just considers himself a common person.
Kerry considers himself as a member of the Ruling Class who is Superior to the common people.
It's not what you belong to. It's how you interpet the membership.
2007-01-20 07:26:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
In the larger scheme of things, I don't really care about it!
What concerns me at present is BUSH's reluctance to bring our troops home; safely and soundly!
2007-01-20 07:23:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as it doesn't interfere with their decision making or as long as the people that voted for them know about it, it's OK.
2007-01-20 07:24:23 · answer #9 · answered by Daniel J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because we live in America.Land of the free.If it really bothers you, MOVE
2007-01-28 00:28:16 · answer #10 · answered by boatworker 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋