No matter ones opinion about the war, the surge, the consequences of failure, or transferring a growing war debt to future generations -- we are there now. Who can argue that focusing all efforts and most resources on resolution would be wrong? And, none could be accused of cutting fund for military.
2007-01-20
06:51:05
·
2 answers
·
asked by
murphy
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
We heard from Paul Wolfowitz and other discredited neo-cons that Iraq oil would pay for the war. Now we read that US and UK corporations may be given huge advantages by a worn-torn Iraq on the verge of collapse. That oil money won't go to the US Treasury.
2007-01-21
05:16:45 ·
update #1