I'm still undecided as of yet:)
2007-01-20 06:35:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am against it. I can't explain why, but I wouldn't disapprove of someone who did have casual love affairs.
2007-01-20 14:34:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sunrise 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
⥠⥠against... for one am married and for two people usually get hurt in a casual affair ⥠â¥
2007-01-20 14:35:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Against. Nothing is casual about love and to treat it so means bad consequences.
2007-01-20 14:34:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Fish <>< 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
against. Love isnt mean to be casual. Love is serious business
2007-01-20 14:34:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Hermione Malfoy 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
By casual, do you mean sex or a friendship with the opposite sex? If sex, then against. If a good friendship, pro.
2007-01-20 14:35:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by smart girl 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Against, as "casual": is too flexible of a word
2007-01-20 14:34:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Against. Undermines the importance of marriage for our society. Bad for our children.
2007-01-20 14:36:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Only against the STD's that casual sex brings with it.....so glad i'm spoken for.
2007-01-20 14:35:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Against of course - No STDs spreading.
2007-01-20 14:34:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by ╦╩╔╩╦ O.J. ╔╩╦╠═ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋