English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A. Familiarity with territory
B. French aid
C. High motivation
D. Good pay and regular supplies
E. More accurate weapons

2007-01-20 05:08:33 · 9 answers · asked by Patrick 2 in Arts & Humanities History

9 answers

Definitely D. There was no difference in weapons. Both sides had similar weapons. Many were manufactured in New England. Many died or froze to death due, mainly, to the lack of supplies. Washington could not fulfill his promises of pay to the colonial forces. After the Revolution, faithful troops were paid with land and animals in the Northwest Territories. George did not fulfill his promises to the Indians of the Ohio Valley, who had aided him against the British, and eventually usurped their lands and became an entrepreneur in these territories. This, and his marriage to Martha, the wealthiest woman in the land, made him very rich.

2007-01-20 05:24:54 · answer #1 · answered by Buffy 5 · 1 0

between The Continental military and The primary British military definite it change into both Armies were trainde to wrestle like gents. in spite of the undeniable fact that i will imagine of dozens and dozens of circumstances the position Hessian Mercenaries Colonial Militias Loyalist Militias and some reuglar British officials,truly Colonel Banastre Tarleton behaved despicably which incorporates looting and rape and homicide of civilians and slaughter of wounded enemy warring parties once they'd surrendered. i trust it change into the tarining and societal backgrounds of lots of the extreme aspect officials on each edge (Washington Greene Layfayette Cornwallis Clinton etc) that saved atrocities to a minumum in the course of the american Revolution

2016-10-17 02:27:58 · answer #2 · answered by rhona 4 · 0 0

d
It is not true the english had better weapons. I worked at a shop building muzzleloaders and am very familiar with these weapons and our guns were much superior. Y'all can read about the battle of Bunker Hill where the English were demorilized by the superior guns of the militia.

2007-01-20 15:05:29 · answer #3 · answered by crackleboy 4 · 0 0

B. French Aid (surrender monkeys)

2007-01-20 05:16:39 · answer #4 · answered by Andy 2 · 1 0

D. Good pay and regular supplies

2007-01-20 05:20:38 · answer #5 · answered by seanboy02149 1 · 0 0

American troops in the Revolution were poorly paid and often had to scavage for food.

2007-01-20 05:16:07 · answer #6 · answered by redunicorn 7 · 1 0

E the British had a more experienced military and much better guns

2007-01-20 05:16:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Who cares, America broke away as a rebel. I think those idiots who "fought for freedom" should have kept it in their pants. America should still be under British rule.

2007-01-20 05:18:28 · answer #8 · answered by Dr. Daniel 2 · 0 1

D

E also, but Ds a better answer.

2007-01-20 05:15:46 · answer #9 · answered by Mikey C 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers