There are women who are paid to test men's fidelity to their partners by seducing them and if the men fail the test, the evidence is recorded (by cameras installed in hotel rooms etc.) and given to the wife so the wife has a great chance of getting the most out of a divorce.
I do not think there is anything wrong with this as if a man is going to cheat he's going to cheat it's just a matter of time. What do you think?
2007-01-20 04:11:46 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
There are probably a few reasons as to why the wife would want to do this, maybe she has the gut feeling that her husband would cheat on her.
2007-01-20 04:16:48 · update #1
NOTICE: the point where the men fail the test is when the men would initiate SEX with the woman. Isn't that cheating?
2007-01-20 04:18:02 · update #2
By seducing I don't mean hitting on the husbands at bars, but in broad daylight and getting to know the husbands and getting close enough to them(like in any ordinary situation), and then seeing where it leads to. The woman who is paid will show enough interest in the guy to lead him on.
2007-01-20 04:23:17 · update #3
My guess would be if she was willing to pay someone to test him, she probably already suspected. So I guess there's nothing wrong with it. Good way to find out for sure and move on! Don't think much of the women being paid to do it though!
2007-01-20 04:19:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well your right to a point. If a beautiful women is paid to put on the moves and in the wrong place and time (like a bar after the guy had been drinking!) then that is B.S.! just look at it this why the guy is sitting there and having a good time and had no thought of cheating and here comes this hottie who starts flirting and teasing him. Now as I said he would never have though of it if she didn't start in on him and she is persistent and he says no but eventually breaks him down then I would say that the person who hired the women is a scumbag piece of garbage! It's entrapment! That would be like a undercover police officer handing you a bag of drugs and then busting you for possession! Now I am not saying he was right but he was put into a situation that would have otherwise not occurred and to take advantage of a person when they are under the influence is wrong! That's like when a women goes out and gets drunk and gives the thumbs up to sex and the next morning cries rape because she made the mistake and regrets it! Hell I'll hire Brad Pitt then we'll see how they handle it! LOL It goes both ways and from what I have seen women are more apt to cheat in a marriage then men!
2007-01-20 12:28:27 · answer #2 · answered by mrjamfy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Entrapment only seems to be legal when being done by different levels of government. Mainly law enforcement.. To be quite honest with you, I have been married for 26 wonderful years, If I was approached, I would fail, but I haven't gone out looking for it. So yes I think it is wrong. To set someone up to fail is always wrong no matter the situation. Why re-enforce the negative when everyone should re-enforce the positive. This world really needs to change their way of thinking.
Oh and by the way,,, Its not only men that cheat.
2007-01-20 12:29:35 · answer #3 · answered by paws 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think if a woman considers doing that, the marriage is over. No need to follow through with it- the trust if gone and she's trying to entice and provoke her man into cheating. That's wrong. Second, any wife who stoops to that level must be pure hell to live with.
2007-01-20 12:15:28 · answer #4 · answered by Violet Pearl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a cheater so if I found out my significant other tried this service, I'd probably dump her insecure ***.
Too many people let their own insecurities prompt them to treat their partner like a lab rat. "well let's see what he does under these conditions".
BS. This is just a situation where people are taking advantage of hardened hearts.
2007-01-20 12:17:50 · answer #5 · answered by lmcbuilder 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
but the test should be done when the man is in his normal state of mind and not "drunk" although why would a wife do that in the first place,,, like pay somebody to test your husband? i think that is like putting a trap on a man... i don't know..
2007-01-20 12:20:34 · answer #6 · answered by toffee-ettes 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's as bad a entrapment. He may have been faithful all his life but now that you have hinted divorce he may feel like "what the hell, why not"! If you have no proof, and till now had now clue he has been unfaithful then you are a con artist trying to steal money that you don't deserve!
2007-01-20 12:17:17 · answer #7 · answered by delux_version 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do I think It's wrong to tempt a person? NO.
Do I think it's wrong to entrap a person for the sake of getting as much out of a divorce as possible? YES
2007-01-20 12:19:03 · answer #8 · answered by ♨ Wisper ► 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that if you distrust your husband or partner that much then you should proabably break up anyway. Also, you've proven that he also has no reason to trust you if you're going to do that. Perhaps you should talk about your issues rather than going behind his back.
2007-01-20 12:17:43 · answer #9 · answered by Cheryl D 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you are in the process of a divorce and looking to increase your assets, it's great! If you are just trying to test your partner, I don't think it's fair!
2007-01-20 12:16:14 · answer #10 · answered by Bryan's Wife 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋