Do you think that the federal government should have less power?

Question

and let the states decide on the majority of the issues?

I.E.

drug laws
social service programs
immigration
education
and so on

I think that all of these issues should be back in the hands of the people and NOT lobbyist and people at the federal level.

If all the people in CA want illegal immigration...so be it...then it would be their problem...if none of the people in AZ want illegal immigrants then there would be STATE laws preventing it.

If the people in AL want marijuana legalized...then as a state it should be..but if the people in TN don't want it then they can vote against it.

and again so on and so forth.

Our state taxes may go up a tad to compensate for the federal funding that they might not receive...but then our fed taxes would also go down since these would be at the state level now.

Answer 1

Yes the government has too much power but pretends to be is powerless to stop the corruption in its self made Monsters. We need less government and more fair policies. They should be subject to their own laws. For example, they should not be able to raise their salaries without raising the minimum wage. They should not allow drug testing on any one unless they are subject to urinalyses. They should not be tapping American phones or making war with smaller nations without the full cooperation of the American people by referendum. So Yeah I feel they have too much power; Presidents Clinton and Bush have show us what real power can make you do in this age we live in. The US Government has never had this much power and it’s destroying the idea that we are a free people. I still believe we can change that.

Answer 2

That is a good plan, but it would never work. The point of having a Union is to have universal laws and truths. If every state has to fend for itself, we would be back to the days of the Civil War. Some issues are OK for the states to regulate themselves, such as smoking laws, gambling, drinking age, etc. But there needs to be Federal laws that are all encompassing. I'll use the immigration laws as an example. Say California lets whomever they want into the state, no questions asked, no paperwork required. Now there are all sorts of people in the Country that we have no idea who they are or why they are here. There is no possible way for the surrounding states to keep out those that have been let in by California. It would never work. All of the illegal immigrants would be spreading across the country within a matter of days.

Answer 3

comparable reason conservatives desire an excellent company government and much less skill to the folk. How's that stereotype artwork for ya? some issues can stay on the state point below specific situations. case in point, we don't want a Federal driving force's license by way of fact all states settle for the licenses of all the different states. different issues won't artwork that way if one state denies some thing that others enable. As in gay marriage. you won't be able to have one state accepting gay marriage and yet another state denying it. It must be all one way or the different. or you have people shifting from one state that helps it to a state that doesn't and dropping all their baby custody rights and probate rights. That only won't artwork. The Founding Fathers fought each and every of the time over which could predominate. there replaced into no one opinion that ruled all. for this reason the Articles of Confederation did no longer final.

Answer 4

well I'm all for less Government,but the states wouldn't be able to completly handle the issues you propose,at least not without the federal laws to help mandate the issues to keep order between the states.And each state has their own set of lobbyists at their capitols,besides Wash.D.C.so I dont think it would completly work

Answer 5

I do, but I think this would slowly lead to a balkanization of the US, as the laws would soon vary greatly from state to state resulting in a less cohesive national identity.

Answer 6

Yes, but the size of government, and their deficit grows under Bush!

States already have many rights granted them under the constitution, while some they do not have.

If it weren't for the government, 12 year-olds would still be working 70 hours a week for business, while the rich line their pockets off their labor!

How are you going to afford to fix your roads and bridges as most of that comes from the feds! Good luck!

Answer 7

ABSOLUTELY!!!!

I respect President Bush, but I think he has expanded the role of the Federal Government more than any Conservative in history.

Answer 8

That's a nice thought, actually following the 10th amendment. Too bad it's not profitable for the fedgov to do so.

Answer 9

I agree Mr.bush change the bankruptcy laws the education laws the way people can sue ,He want to make a fed law against gay marriage

Answer 10

Amen sister