for more details see this question...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuubgG8V0wInCSGwk3ZGRDTS7BR.?qid=20070120073953AAESAx9
2007-01-20 03:20:33 · 10 answers · asked by BigBadWolf 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I doubt any of you who answer bothered to see my link amd Learn I was talking about Hillary Rodham Clinton!
2007-01-20 12:31:35 · update #1
Yes, if she was not involved in the commission of the crimes, but later conceals evidence, she is either obstructing the police, or an accomplice after the fact.
2007-01-20 04:42:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-01-20 03:24:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes she is an accomplice by the simple act of covering it up.
She can't be made to testify against him but she can be charged herself.
2007-01-20 03:28:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. By law, she is considered an accomplice and can be charged.
2007-01-20 03:41:37 · answer #4 · answered by Kikyo 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Definitely yes and will end up charged as such when they are caught
2007-01-20 03:29:46 · answer #5 · answered by bisquedog 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
YES SHE IS, IN MORE WAYS THAN ONE. SHE'S AIDING AND ABETTING, FAILING TO REPORT A CRIME, AND AMONG OTHER THINGS A TOTAL IDIOT.
2007-01-20 03:29:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
but for her own self involved or got raped then no question of rape i think
2007-01-20 03:24:16 · answer #7 · answered by david j 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes she is and she is also heartless.
2007-01-20 03:28:23 · answer #8 · answered by LENA 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
OOOOOOOHH, YES!
2007-01-20 03:31:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't have to see the details. The answer to your question is YES. duh
2007-01-20 03:28:31 · answer #10 · answered by T G 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋