yes, let's divert the taxpayer's money from arresting and prosecuting rapist, child molesters, murders, drug dealers, armed robbers...what a great idea! we can fill the jails and prisons with the unfaithful! THEN--we can leave their children devastated in the streets!!!! emotionally scarred for life!!!!! yes, even better!!!!!
2007-01-19 23:19:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by ... 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, that IS absurd.
I think it is it's own best punishment.
Hahaha, divorce is pretty severe, too!
Sounds like it is a legal wrangle over interpretation of statutory language.... Many laws would be ridiculous if interpreted literally as written.
2007-01-20 07:18:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by zen 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The utter ridiculousness of the Michigan law speaks for itself.
2007-01-21 05:27:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by x 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would be a good idea- it would help stop the deterioration of the family and the spread of disease- I think way back when it use to be a crime- and these days it can kill you w hepatitis and aids-and cervical cancer- D
2007-01-20 07:16:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Debby B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
it will be in Michigan...might slow down the divorce rate in that state..
2007-01-20 07:14:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
only if it is good. If it is mediocre sex, it should be written off with a warning.
2007-01-20 07:15:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Snowy Marie 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, where do we draw the line if we prosecute for this?
Next I spect, it will be no sex before marriage. . . (?)
2007-01-20 07:16:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by hyper99 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
if you do you're going to need a lot more jails
2007-01-20 07:17:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
there would be half the population in prison
2007-01-20 07:14:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
the laws aren't the problem...the implementation is.
2007-01-20 07:19:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bubuchachum 6
·
2⤊
0⤋