The presidential form of government is fine, but the present system (parliamentary) isn't bad either. In the parliamentary system, legislature is paramount, that is so because the executive is a part of legislature. Whereas, separation of power is the core of the presidential system.(i.e. separation of power between the three organs of the state >< executive, legislature and the judiciary). Both the systems have their own merits and demerits. The thing that really matters is not the form or system of government (Presidential or Parliamentary), but the people who form the government(read politicians) and the CITIZENS of a country, who are truly responsible to make any form of government successful one.
2007-01-20 00:23:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sanjay K 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The shape grow to be framed by skill of a number of human beings after deliberations of over a 12 months, and it grow to be so framed that the flexibility would not relax with the President on my own. As consistent with the shape,The President is meant to act on the propose of Committee of Ministers headed by skill of the best Minister. as a result It grow to be planned in this variety of way that whether the country's head is the President, the de facto authority in power is the best Minister, and it grow to be our Pundit Nehru who grow to be the 1st best Minister of India. If the flexibility is vested with the President , shall we've remoted upon the top of the State for any mis-administration or anarchy. Now we are caught up with the Faceless Committee of Ministers who won't be able to be pointed out in isolation. we at the instant are purely dreaming approximately transforming into Shanghai rather putting an occasion.
2016-11-25 21:53:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by hutt 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Parliamentary democracy (like the British system) also has many merits. Smaller political parties (minorities . . . etc) are often better represented in government. As an American, I'm just happy to see good things happening in India.
2007-01-19 23:00:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
India is gradually evolving to become a totally free country. We must wait for sometime instead of experimenting with varieties of democracies. Neibouring Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are experimenting on their people only to find that any form of government is same.
2007-01-19 21:22:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
when we have a system(parliamentary) working,then why should we think about presidential system.
2007-01-20 05:34:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Alien 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES IT IS VERY GOOD FOR INDIA
2007-01-19 21:31:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by s.r.sugan s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES
2007-01-19 21:08:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sumi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
2007-01-19 21:46:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋