English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

I'll assume you want the goals to be non-violence and two separate countries.
The only way to achieve those goals is to keep the rest of the world on-side -- the Arab League, the U.S., the E.U, Russia, and of course the UN.
Taking the hard line aggavates several of these groups.

So what's wrong with taking the hard line is that, in effect, it works against the long-term interests of both Israel and Palestine.

2007-01-19 18:08:45 · answer #1 · answered by will_o_the_west 5 · 2 0

The "hardline" is all we have left. We've tried to negotiate peace time and time and time again.. only to have the "Palestinians" reject it at every turn.

2007-01-20 02:18:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers