Yes. If it spent more time trying to find the "dryness" that it has inside itself, it wouldn't make everything else wet. It just needs therapy, and some time think.
2007-01-20 02:24:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by BANANA 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not the water to blame wet but the surface which get wet when water pours on it!!!
Is itn't?
2007-01-20 02:06:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by amit_the_invincible 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
No.
You can only assert the description of "wet" to something that would otherwise be "dry". Water is water, not wet. Water can make something else wet, but not itself.
2007-01-20 02:02:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, but you can blame water for never pondering what it's like to be dry. Nietzche's quite a fellow.
2007-01-20 02:35:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rat 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why would I blame it? I'd like to thank it for being that way.
2007-01-20 02:00:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by marklemoore 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not unless you blame me too-----quit picking on water.
2007-01-20 02:03:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by EZMZ 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, I blame myself for not having an umbrella
2007-01-20 02:01:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Randy W 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
No more than you can blame Paris Hilton from being a stupid spoiled whore.
2007-01-20 02:01:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Frozen water is not wet until it melts.
*Drum roll*
2007-01-20 02:01:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Roman Soldier 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes its just asking for trouble.
2007-01-20 02:00:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by master_alucard0 1
·
1⤊
1⤋