This question is about women who grab them to harm their genitals.
Deuteronomy 25:11-12 When men fight with one another, and the wife of the one shall come near to deliver her husband from his assailant's hand, and shall put out her hand and lay hold on his genitals, then you shall cut off her palm; your eye shall not pity.
By the way...this is a serious question...not trying to be funny here or sacreligious.
2007-01-19 17:42:47 · 8 answers · asked by J.P. 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
As long as she didn't seize my secret too hard. There was this one time walking down Bragg Boulevard at Fayetteville N.C. when a blond walked up to me and seized my secret. It was not to bad, just surprising.
2007-01-19 18:03:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I read that correctly, what that is saying is, if two men are in a fight, and the wife of one of them starts tugging on the other guy's balls to get him off of her husband, it's not kosher, and she should be punished. It's kind of a severe punishment if you ask me. But that sort of behavior should not be encouraged, even today. It's just not cool. I'd say a woman should spend the same time in jail as any man would for committing assualt, in this day in age.
Those are part of Sundry Laws. I don't know much about those though. They were for the Chosen People who were traveling in the wilderness at that time. As you know there is a new law, the New Testament. I don't know if it addresses this issue though.
Also notable Sundry Law...."You shall not muzzle the ox while he is threshing." REMEMBER THAT!
2007-01-20 01:57:14 · answer #2 · answered by no mas 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dear Truth Seeker, The old testaments peoples had many violent and barbaric ways. But, when Jesus came to the earth as Gods messenger, he told us to forgo the violence.(animal sacrifices, stoning,etc..) He preached of Gods Love, of tolerance, forgiveness. I do not believe that God intended for human beings to maim each other for misconduct. Grabbing a man genitals to inflict harm is wrong unless it is in self defense.But even tho it is wrong I still cannot imagine God condoning such an action! So I would have to not only No but Hell No!!!!
2007-01-20 02:33:55 · answer #3 · answered by Foxgirl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because the "Equipment" was "On-Display" where She could get to it. So, whose Fault is that ? If the "Equipment" had been "Properly Secured" then there would not have been "Harm" Inflicted. This, of course, would not apply at a Nudist Colony ! <>L<>O<>L<> !!
2007-01-20 01:54:53 · answer #4 · answered by gvaporcarb 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What the hell you talking about, Dude!!! I live to have my secrets seized!!!
2007-01-20 01:52:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
nope
2007-01-20 01:45:28 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-01-20 03:05:38 · answer #7 · answered by amberharris20022000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-01-20 01:46:32 · answer #8 · answered by sindi 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋